get_super_lotto_month

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral-disclosure burden. It only implies a read operation via 'Get' and says nothing about authentication, rate limits, pagination, empty results, or whether the operation can fail for invalid months.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the core operation before listing arguments. The Args section is somewhat schema-like but earns its place because the schema itself has no parameter descriptions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and both parameters are documented. However, for a retrieval tool with no annotations, the description does not provide enough context about usage conditions or constraints to be fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter semantics. It does document both parameters, explaining that 'year' is the target year with an example (2024) and 'month' is the target month with an example (5), which meaningfully compensates for the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('super lotto 638 / 威力彩 data in the specified month'), which clearly identifies the tool. The named lottery game differentiates it from sibling tools like get_lotto_649_month and get_daily_cash_month, though it does not explicitly state the alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling lottery tools or any other alternatives. The only implied usage is retrieving a specific game's monthly data, with no exclusions or prerequisite conditions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.