project_list
List project and folder names in the current database folder for quick reference.
Instructions
List project and folder names in the current database folder.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List project and folder names in the current database folder for quick reference.
List project and folder names in the current database folder.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only mentions listing without disclosing behavioral traits such as read-only nature, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence, front-loaded with verb and resource, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, and description does not specify the structure of the returned list (e.g., array of strings or objects). Could be more complete by describing output format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate since description adds no parameter info but is not required.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'project and folder names' in the current database folder. It distinguishes itself from other list-type sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides context (current database folder) but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like clip_list or bin_tree.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/irstone-source/resolve-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server