fusion_comp_delete
Delete a Fusion composition from a timeline clip in DaVinci Resolve.
Instructions
Delete a Fusion comp from a timeline clip.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| item_handle | No |
Delete a Fusion composition from a timeline clip in DaVinci Resolve.
Delete a Fusion comp from a timeline clip.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| item_handle | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic action but omits key details like whether the deletion is reversible, what happens to the clip, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is concise but could benefit from additional essential details without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and zero parameter descriptions, the description fails to provide sufficient context for safe and correct use. The tool's behavior and inputs are largely undefined.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the parameters 'name' and 'item_handle'. The agent receives no guidance on what values to provide or how they affect the operation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('Fusion comp from a timeline clip'), making the purpose unambiguous. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like 'fusion_comp_add' or 'fusion_comp_rename'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description lacks any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as prerequisites or exclusions. No context is provided about when deletion is appropriate or how it differs from similar operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/irstone-source/resolve-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server