Skip to main content
Glama
ionos-cloud

IONOS CLOUD MCP Server

Official

list_billing_invoices_by_period

Retrieve invoices for a specified billing month. For multi-month ranges, the tool calculates needed calls and requests user approval before proceeding.

Instructions

List invoices for a specific billing period (YYYY-MM). One month per call. If the user requests a range longer than one month, calculate the number of monthly calls required, inform the user, and ask for permission before proceeding. For FOCUS v1.3 compliant output, read resource ionos://billing/focus-v1.3.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodYesbilling period in YYYY-MM format (e.g. 2026-04)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not state that it is a read-only operation, nor does it mention authorization requirements, pagination, or error handling. It only discloses the monthly constraint and FOCUS v1.3 output option.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no filler. First sentence states purpose, second gives constraint, third provides multi-call guidance, fourth adds output format note.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite simplicity, the description covers the one-month constraint and multi-call scenario, but lacks details on response format, error handling, or required permissions. The FOCUS note is a plus.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides for the 'period' parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists invoices for a specific billing period in YYYY-MM format, with the constraint of one month per call. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_billing_invoices which likely lists all invoices without a period filter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance: one month per call, and instructs to calculate and ask permission for longer ranges. Does not explicitly mention alternative tools but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ionos-cloud/ionoscloud-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server