get_object_storage_access_key

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the secret key is not returned, which is a critical behavioral detail beyond the input schema. With no annotations, this adds value by setting expectations for the response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys purpose and a key behavioral constraint with no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description covers the basic purpose and a critical behavioral aspect, it does not specify what 'metadata' includes (e.g., creation date, status). Without an output schema, the agent may need to infer the response structure, leaving some uncertainty.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides a description for the only parameter (access_key_id), and the description does not add additional semantic detail beyond identifying the key by ID. Baseline 3 as schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get details), the resource (specific Object Storage access key), and the method (by ID). It also distinguishes from the sibling 'list_object_storage_access_keys' by focusing on a single key.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool is for retrieving a single key when the ID is known, contrasting with the list tool. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this vs. alternatives or provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.