Browser-MCP Navigator
Related Servers
Alternatives to Browser-MCP Navigator
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight 30KB MCP browser automation server that uses raw Chrome DevTools Protocol to enable AI agents to browse the web, take screenshots, interact with elements, and capture live page events like console logs and network requests.267 npm15MIT

kitewrightofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server for browser automation that gives AI agents navigate, screenshot, and extract tools via a single small binary, without needing Node.js or Playwright. It provides CDP-based browser control with efficient startup and resource usage.23MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancesingle-binary MCP server that gives AI agents a browser. 66 tools for navigation, form filling, data extraction, screenshots, and DOM diffing — built on pure Chrome DevTools Protocol.13MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to control Chrome via DevTools CDP and accessibility trees, providing 21 tools for browser automation including tab management, navigation, interactions, and page capture.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server for AI browser automation. Connects to your own Chromium instance via CDP, providing tools for browser control, navigation, interaction, and content extraction.191MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI agents to browser DevTools via CDP, enabling real-time access to console logs, network requests, and page state.-
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., click vs js_click vs cdp_call), but the difference between click and js_click might confuse an agent without careful reading. Overall, each tool targets a unique action.
All names use snake_case, but the pattern mixes simple verbs (click, hover, scroll) with verb_noun phrases (get_text, read_console, press_key) and compound noun_verb (js_eval, cdp_call). This inconsistency, while still readable, could be improved.
21 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool serves a specific need in browser automation (navigation, interaction, JavaScript execution, bulk operations, etc.). The count feels justified for the domain.
Covers essential browser automation operations: navigation, clicking, typing, scrolling, waiting, reading page state, console/network monitoring, and JavaScript execution. Missing a dedicated file upload tool, but can be done via cdp_call. Minor gaps overall.