Skip to main content
Glama
infraveilhq

infraveil-guard

Official
by infraveilhq
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to infraveil-guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Terminus

      interceptai-tech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A default-deny SQL firewall sidecar for AI agents that enforces per-agent policies on database queries, provides safe rewrites, and maintains a tamper-evident audit chain.
      AGPL 3.0

    • agent-guardrail

      ss1738
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A runtime gate for coding agents. Blocks the tool calls that wreck a repo (force-push main, rm -rf, secret exfiltration, CI wipe) and lets normal build and commit work through. Machine-checked git-branch core (z3); the rest is high-precision heuristics. Tested on 3,790 real CI commands, 0 false blocks.
      1
      MIT

    • AegisMCP

      thekartikeyamishra
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first security gateway and visual dashboard for AI agents that enforces cost caps, blocks prompt injections, and requires approval for dangerous actions.
      2
      -

    • Agent File Guardian

      ShinYeol-Lee
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a human-in-the-loop security layer for AI agents by intercepting file operations, explaining them with a local LLM, and enforcing a deterministic policy that requires user approval for risky actions.
      MIT

    • Sentinel

      fncreator22
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A three-stage guardrail agent for LLM-powered coding assistants that reviews proposed actions before execution, blocking destructive commands and maintaining an audit trail.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: assess_action for risk assessment without recording, guard_action for pre-execution gating, recent_decisions for history review, and verify_ledger for integrity verification. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: assess_action, guard_action, recent_decisions, verify_ledger. No deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for a security guard/audit domain. Each tool serves a clear function without redundancy or omission.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full lifecycle: risk assessment (assess_action), action gating (guard_action), audit review (recent_decisions), and integrity verification (verify_ledger). No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources