boond_resources_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It communicates only that the operation is a get by ID; it does not mention what happens if the resource is not found, whether the result is a single object, permission expectations, or any other behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact sentence with no filler or repetition. It front-loads the core action and the lookup mechanism, so every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter getter with no output schema, the description covers the action, target, and lookup key. However, it omits return expectations and error behavior, which would be useful given that no annotations or output schema exist to fill those gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only defines 'id' as a required string, and the description adds the key semantic that this ID is the lookup key for the resource. Since the parameter coverage in the schema is 0%, the description provides a minimal but sufficient clarification for this one-parameter getter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a clear verb ('Get') and target ('resource by ID'), so an agent can understand this is the single-resource fetch tool. It does not explicitly contrast itself with sibling search/create/update tools, but the verb and ID-based lookup are enough to distinguish it at a basic level.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance about when to use this tool versus boond_resources_search or other getters. The 'by ID' phrasing implies it is for fetching one known resource, but the description never states that search is the appropriate alternative for listing or filtering.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.