boond_banking_accounts_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Search' implies a read-only operation, but pagination, filtering, ordering, and return format are not mentioned. This is a significant gap for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, front-loaded, and contains no filler. It is more under-specified than verbose, but as a concise statement it is appropriately short.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter search with no output schema, the description provides minimal context but leaves out expected result shape and behavioral details. Given the ambiguity with sibling tools and lack of annotations, the description is not complete enough for confident invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the empty schema is fully documented and the description adds no parameter semantics. Since there are no parameters to explain, the baseline score of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Search') and resource ('banking accounts'), forming an understandable action-target pair. However, it is vague about what 'search' entails and does not distinguish this from sibling tools like boond_accounts_search or boond_banking_accounts_get. The purpose is recognizable but under-specified.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as boond_banking_accounts_get or boond_banking_transactions_search. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context cues. The agent must infer usage entirely from the tool name and minimal description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.