getBalanceSheetStatementGrowth

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, so the description adds value by detailing that it tracks changes in assets, liabilities, and equity over time. However, it does not disclose rate limits, authentication needs, or other behavioral traits beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences that front-load the main purpose and then elaborate on what is tracked. Every sentence contributes meaning without redundancy, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 3-parameter tool with annotations and no output schema, the description adequately covers what the tool does and what it tracks. It could mention the output format (growth percentages vs absolute changes) but remains sufficiently complete for an agent to understand its purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description does not add extra meaning to the parameters beyond what is already in the schema. It mentions tracking assets, liabilities, and equity, which relates to the output but not parameter usage, so no additional semantic value is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'analyze' and 'track' with the resource 'balance sheet items over time'. It distinguishes the tool from siblings like getBalanceSheetStatement by emphasizing growth analysis, making the purpose specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for growth analysis but does not explicitly specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like getBalanceSheetStatement or getBalanceSheetGrowthBulk. No when-not conditions or alternative tool names are provided, leaving the decision to the agent's inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.