Skip to main content
Glama
igorolv

sonar-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to sonar-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes SonarQube data as AI agent tools, enabling project discovery, quality gates, measures, issues, hotspots, rule explanations, source code, and raw API access.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that provides AI assistants with structured access to SonarQube projects, issues, metrics, and rules. It enables safe analysis of code quality and security findings through a set of validated, safety-first tools.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python MCP server for SonarQube, enabling AI agents to query projects, issues, quality gates, coverage, and security hotspots.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SonarQube that enables LLM agents to discover projects, analyze code quality metrics, check Quality Gate status, search issues with filters, and rank projects by worst-performing metrics. It provides read-only, safe access to SonarQube instances with structured outputs and error handling.
      5
      21 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (get/list for project, issue, hotspot, rule, components, branches, PRs). The three issue-related tools are clearly differentiated: listIssues returns details, getProjectIssuesSummary returns aggregate facets, and getProjectIssuesBreakdown groups by module/rule.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent getX/listX pattern in camelCase, with nouns clearly indicating the resource. No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool covers a specific aspect of SonarQube analysis (projects, issues, hotspots, rules, branches, PRs, components). No redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Core read-only analysis workflows are well covered: project metrics, issue list/detail/snippets/aggregations, hotspot handling, and branch/PR scoping. Minor gaps include no listRules (only getRule) and no write actions (e.g., issue assignment or hotspot review), but these are not central to an analysis-focused server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues