weibo-comment-search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It does state that pagination is supported ('支持翻页'), which is relevant, but it does not describe the returned data shape, rate limits, or any read-only/safety guarantees beyond the implication of the word '查询'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded: the core operation comes first, and the pagination behavior follows. There is no filler or redundancy, and every part of the sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter query tool, the description plus the fully documented schema is mostly sufficient for basic invocation. However, with no output schema and no annotations, the agent receives no description of what the response contains or the pagination loop contract beyond the schema's cursor reference.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both weiboId and cursor are already well documented in the input schema. The description adds only a general pagination note and does not materially extend the parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific operation ('查询' comment) on a specific resource ('微博博文评论'), and it clearly distinguishes this tool from siblings like weibo-post-search and weibo-hot-search. It also adds the pagination capability, making the tool's purpose immediately understandable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as weibo-post-search, weibo-hot-search, or other platform comment tools. The description does not mention any use conditions, exclusions, or when not to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.