delete_day

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It states the action (delete) but provides no details on reversibility, side effects on related data (e.g., activities on that day), or authorization requirements, which is a significant gap for a deletion tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: one line for purpose and a short args section. It is front-loaded and efficient, though the mix of Korean and English is slightly messy but not critical.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and sibling tools, the description is adequate for a simple delete operation. However, it lacks behavioral context (e.g., side effects on days with content) and does not explain the output, making it only minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description adds meaning by labeling trip_id as '여행 ID' and day_id as '삭제할 일자 ID (get_trip에서 확인)'. This provides minimal but helpful context beyond the raw schema, though it does not describe format or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states '일자를 삭제한다' (Delete a day), specifying a specific verb and resource. Among sibling tools like clear_day_content, create_day, update_day, it uniquely identifies itself as the deletion tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context by naming the required parameters and giving a hint to verify day_id via get_trip. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like clear_day_content, so exclusions are missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.