Skip to main content
Glama

create_activity

Add a new activity to a trip day, specifying category, title, start/end times, location, cost, and reservation status.

Instructions

일자에 활동을 추가한다.

Args: trip_id: 여행 ID day_id: 일자 ID (get_trip에서 확인) category: 활동 유형 (SIGHTSEEING, DINING, TRANSPORT, ACCOMMODATION, SHOPPING, OTHER) title: 활동 제목 (예: "벨렝 탑 방문") start_time: 시작 시간 HH:mm (예: "09:30", 선택) start_timezone: 시작 IANA 시간대 (예: "Asia/Seoul", 선택) end_time: 종료 시간 HH:mm (예: "11:00", 선택) end_timezone: 종료 IANA 시간대 (예: "Europe/Lisbon", 선택) location: 장소명 (예: "Torre de Belém", 선택) memo: 메모 (선택) cost: 예상 비용 (0이면 미입력, 선택) currency: 통화 코드 (기본 EUR) reservation_status: 예약 상태 (REQUIRED, RECOMMENDED, ON_SITE, NOT_NEEDED, RESERVED, 선택)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
trip_idYes
day_idYes
categoryYes
titleYes
start_timeNo
start_timezoneNo
end_timeNo
end_timezoneNo
locationNo
memoNo
costNo
currencyNoEUR
reservation_statusNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions creation but lacks side effects, error conditions, or limitations (e.g., whether the day must exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-organized with a title and a structured Args block. Slightly verbose due to many parameters, but justified for clarity; every line adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description fully documents input parameters, it does not explain the return value (output schema exists but not described), leaving a gap in completeness for a tool with many siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description's Args section adds detailed explanations for each parameter, including formats, defaults, and category enum values, significantly supplementing the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's verb ('adds') and resource ('activity to a day'), making it specific and distinguishable from siblings like delete_activity or update_activity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_activity). It does not mention prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/idean3885/trip-planner'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server