MCP Magic UI
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_all_componentsD | – |
| get_component_by_pathD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves all components, while the other retrieves a specific component by path. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the need for bulk vs. targeted retrieval.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get' as the verb, and they use snake_case uniformly. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the tool set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a UI-related domain, as it lacks operations for creating, updating, or deleting components, which are typical in such contexts. This minimal set may not support comprehensive agent workflows effectively.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a UI component domain, covering only retrieval operations. There are obvious gaps for CRUD/lifecycle management, such as create, update, or delete tools, which will likely cause agent failures when full component manipulation is needed.