A
licenseC
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to generate, fetch, and manage UI components through natural language interactions.
3
23 npm
7
ISC
MCP Magic UI
by idcdev
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Magic UI
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants access to Mesh Design System components and design tokens, enabling AI-powered development tools to natively understand and utilize these UI components.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceModelContextProtocol server for Magic UI that allows AI assistants to easily implement UI components for web applications by providing code for components like marquees, animations, special effects, and interactive backgrounds.112,162 npm206MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides a foundation for building MCP servers that expose UI component registries to AI assistants, enabling component discovery and retrieval.33 npm11MIT
- -licenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA foundation for building interactive applications using the Model Context Protocol that integrates AI capabilities with Magic UI components.112,162 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes the @bunge/ds-components design system catalog, allowing AI assistants to list, search, and retrieve component details including inputs, outputs, usage examples, and import instructions.4MIT
TDQS
D1.8/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves all components, while the other retrieves a specific component by path. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the need for bulk vs. targeted retrieval.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get' as the verb, and they use snake_case uniformly. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the tool set.
Tool Count2/5
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a UI-related domain, as it lacks operations for creating, updating, or deleting components, which are typical in such contexts. This minimal set may not support comprehensive agent workflows effectively.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a UI component domain, covering only retrieval operations. There are obvious gaps for CRUD/lifecycle management, such as create, update, or delete tools, which will likely cause agent failures when full component manipulation is needed.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues