F
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that connects LLM agents to a local LM Studio instance, enabling model management, OpenAI-compatible chat completions, text completions, and embeddings through a set of tools.
9
1
-
mcp-server-lmstudio
by ibukichi-jp
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-lmstudio
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes local LM Studio language models as MCP tools, enabling chat completions and model listing through a local OpenAI-compatible API without requiring API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceHosts local MCP servers on Windows, enabling connection of local AI models (like Gemma) to external tools without cloud dependency.464 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with local LLMs via LM Studio, supporting dynamic chat, vision, RAG, file interaction, and model orchestration.28-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges MCP clients with local LLM services, enabling seamless integration with MCP-compatible applications through standard tools like chat completion, model listing, and health checks.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal MCP server that exposes fixed tools for GPT, Claude, and Gemini while routing to any OpenAI-compatible chat completions backend with independent configuration per target.1-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a clearly distinct function: listing models, asking the LLM, and checking server status. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All names use snake_case with a consistent verb-first pattern (list_, ask_, check_). The minor variation in object wording reflects their distinct targets rather than inconsistent convention.
Tool Count5/5
Three tools are well-scoped for the narrow purpose of interacting with a local LM Studio server. Each tool earns its place and no tool feels redundant or missing at this scale.
Completeness4/5
Core operations for checking status, listing models, and querying the LLM are covered. Minor gaps exist, such as model load/unload or generation parameter control, but these are not essential for basic use.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues