create_document

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description lacks disclosure of behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication needs, or error handling beyond a generic failure message. It does not add significant insight beyond the obvious creation action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a prominent prerequisites section, a concise summary, and bullet-style parameter explanations. It is front-loaded with critical information, though slightly verbose but every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 parameters, no schema descriptions, no annotations), the description covers prerequisites, parameter details, and return values. Missing details about error conditions and output schema nuances, but largely sufficient for the agent to use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates well by explaining each parameter's purpose and defaults (e.g., class_identifier defaults to 'Document', file_in_folder_identifier starts with '/'). This adds meaning beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'creates' and resource 'document in the content repository', with specification of properties. It is unambiguous and directly indicates the tool's function, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_folder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists mandatory prerequisites in order: calling determine_class and get_class_property_descriptions. This provides clear step-by-step guidance for when and how to use the tool, setting it apart from alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.