Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeskPilot

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that lets an LLM see and drive any running Windows app: attach a window, screenshot it, read its UI Automation tree, and send clicks, typed text, and key presses with pixel coordinates.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An accessibility-first Windows computer-use MCP server that lets AI agents find and click real UI Automation controls, falling back to a vision model of your choice only when a control isn't exposed. Agents get short text results instead of screenshots while driving the real mouse and keyboard, with a visible control panel and hard stops.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
    119 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that gives any AI assistant eyes and hands on your desktop — screenshots, clicking, typing, OCR, window management, accessibility-tree queries, workflow recording.
    5
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A local MCP server for Windows that gives Claude control of your screen, enabling screen viewing, image-based element finding, clicking/typing, macro recording and replaying, and scheduled automation with failsafe safety features.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server providing AI-friendly computer-use primitives (capture, detect, click) to let LLM agents drive desktop GUI applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
    2
    MIT

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a fairly distinct capability (inspect, find, act, clipboard, launch, window management, record/replay, screenshot), and descriptions carefully rank cost so agents know when to use find vs snapshot vs screenshot. However, snapshot's filter parameter largely duplicates find, and act's built-in launch/focus/scroll steps overlap with the launch and window tools, creating minor boundary confusion.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names are short lowercase tokens, but the set mixes nouns (clipboard, window, routine, screenshot) with verbs (find, act, launch, done), and screen_info is the lone snake_case outlier. Readable, but no predictable verb_noun convention to generalize from.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is well-scoped for a desktop-control agent: one tool per major capability tier (observe, find, act, transport utilities, automation, cleanup) with no filler tools. Nothing looks padded or missing at the count level.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the full perceive-act loop: screen/window enumeration, element discovery, input execution, launching, clipboard, replayable routines, and a proper teardown via done. Minor gaps exist — window management only explicitly advertises move/target (no clear close/minimize/resize), and there's no way to read a titled window's text without OCR or snapshotting.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues