get_file_overview

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes output structure but does not explicitly state it is read-only or mention any side effects. Without annotations, disclosure of behavioral traits is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short and to the point, with separate sections for Args and Returns. Could be slightly more front-loaded with the main purpose, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, parameters, and returned structure. Missing usage prerequisites, error cases, or performance notes, but adequate given the tool's simplicity and presence of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds clear semantics for both parameters: 'path' as project root directory and 'file' as project-relative path, compensating well for the lacking schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states verb 'extract' and resource 'structural overview of a file', listing specific output elements (imports, classes, functions, exports). This clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'explain_file' or 'get_call_graph'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'explain_file' or 'get_symbol_detail'. Lacks any when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.