generate_architecture_diagram

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description lacks behavioral details such as side effects, prerequisites (e.g., requires project scan), or performance implications. It only mentions generation without further context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short and structured with an Args section. However, it mixes languages (Turkish and English), which may reduce clarity. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity and lack of annotations, the description is incomplete—it doesn't mention prerequisites, output details (though output schema exists), or integration with other tools like scan_project. More context is needed for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% but description adds meaning: 'path' is project root directory, 'style' has options listed. However, it doesn't explain differences between style options or any constraints, leaving gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states it generates project architecture diagram in Mermaid format, which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like detect_architecture or generate_dependency_matrix by focusing on diagram generation, but could be more explicit about the output format's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like detect_architecture or generate_dependency_matrix. The description only states what it does, not when or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.