GuiaIA MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to GuiaIA MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes OpenClaw gateway tools to MCP clients like Claude Code and Codex, enabling local tool calls, file operations, and subagent session management through a stdio MCP server.1,122 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes AI Disk Doctor Core's scan, model inventory, and history tools via local stdio, with no mutation or shell capabilities.4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to inspect Godot project and editor state, observe opted-in running scenes, manage processes, and apply permission-scoped guarded edits. It starts read-only and exposes additional capabilities only through explicit command-line flags.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceStarts local MCP backend servers only when their tools are called, exposes their tools through a single stdio gateway, preserves stateful sessions, and can stop safely restartable backends after idle timeouts.5 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to query a live Factorio 2.0 world through bounded read-only operations covering spatial, inventory, resource, and diagnostic data over loopback RCON.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable AI clients to control a local computer over stdio with filesystem operations, ripgrep search, shell command execution, and persistent process sessions.14MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have mostly distinct roles: status reading, performance metrics reading, diagnosis interpretation, and request-to-plan parsing. However, guia_status, guia_performance, and guia_diagnose all operate on telemetry and could be confused when an agent just wants 'the current situation.' The descriptions help, but boundaries are not perfectly sharp.
All tools share the guia_ prefix and snake_case style, giving a predictable namespace. The second component is less uniform: status and performance are noun-like read targets, diagnose is a verb, and plan_gather is a compound action. This is a minor deviation rather than a real inconsistency.
Four tools is well within the appropriate range for a focused advisory/diagnostics server. Each tool has a clear place: status, metrics, diagnosis, and planning. Nothing feels redundant or bloated.
The read-only, non-executing scope is coherent and covered by status, performance, diagnosis, and plan gathering. There are minor gaps around discovering what telemetry or plan types are available, but the surface supports the stated safe-advisory purpose without obvious dead ends.