project_human
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| accessibility_auditA | Audit web pages for WCAG 2.2 compliance or set session WCAG level. Crawl mode: provide pages with URL+HTML for per-page scoring and ranking across all 86 success criteria. Session mode: returns the complete WCAG checklist for the requested level that the agent must enforce. |
| rewrite_depression_sensitive_contentA | Audit or rewrite text to be sensitive to depression and mental health. Removes harmful language patterns and replaces them with supportive, non-stigmatising alternatives. Safety boundary: non-clinical UX/content guidance only. |
| supportive_replyA | Generate a supportive, non-clinical reply to a message from someone in distress. Supports general emotional support and grief-specific modes (presence, practical, reflection). Includes escalation guidance calibrated to the assessed risk level. Safety boundary: non-clinical support only; must escalate when risk is elevated. |
| cognitive_accessibility_auditA | Audit content for cognitive accessibility — plain language, reading level, structure, and clarity. Returns actionable recommendations to reduce cognitive load. Safety boundary: design guidance only. |
| cultural_context_checkA | Check a message for cultural sensitivity issues for a given audience or region. Returns flags, concerns, and suggested alternatives with uncertainty disclosure. Safety boundary: context-sensitive recommendations with uncertainty disclosure. |
| deescalation_planA | Generate a structured de-escalation plan for a conflict or tense situation. Returns step-by-step guidance calibrated to the intensity of the conflict. Safety boundary: no coercive tactics. |
| empathetic_reframeA | Reframe a message with genuine empathy — acknowledging emotions, validating experience, and offering presence. Detects and replaces hollow empathy phrases with authentic alternatives. Safety boundary: no manipulation or deceptive empathy. |
| neurodiversity_design_checkA | Audit a UI description for neurodiversity-aware design — covering ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and sensory sensitivities. Returns targeted recommendations for inclusive design. Safety boundary: inclusive design guidance only. |
| age_inclusive_design_checkA | Audit a user flow or interface for age-inclusive design — covering children, adults, and older users. Returns recommendations to remove age-related barriers. Safety boundary: inclusive design guidance only. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: WCAG accessibility audits, depression-sensitive rewriting, supportive replies, cognitive accessibility, cultural context checks, de-escalation plans, empathetic reframing, neurodiversity design, and age-inclusive design. No overlap; agents can easily differentiate.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., accessibility_audit, rewrite_depression_sensitive_content, cultural_context_check). Predictable and uniform.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for the domain of human-centered design and sensitive communication. Each tool earns its place without being too few or too many.
The tools comprehensively cover accessibility (WCAG, cognitive, neurodiversity, age), mental health sensitivity, cultural sensitivity, and communication guidance. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose of inclusive and sensitive interaction.