Skip to main content
Glama
hrishi0102

Spotify MCP Server

by hrishi0102

Сервер Spotify MCP

Простой сервер Model Context Protocol (MCP), который позволяет вам взаимодействовать со Spotify через Claude. Этот сервер позволяет Claude искать песни, создавать плейлисты, получать рекомендации и многое другое, используя ваш аккаунт Spotify.

Функции

  • Поиск треков на Spotify

  • Просмотр вашего профиля Spotify

  • Создавайте плейлисты

  • Добавить треки в плейлисты

  • Получайте персонализированные музыкальные рекомендации

Related MCP server: Spotify MCP Server

Доступные инструменты

Название инструмента

Описание

set-spotify-credentials

Установите учетные данные для аутентификации Spotify

check-credentials-status

Проверьте, верны ли ваши учетные данные и кто вошел в систему

search-tracks

Поиск треков по названию, исполнителю или ключевым словам

get-current-user

Получите информацию о своем профиле Spotify

create-playlist

Создайте новый плейлист в своей учетной записи

add-tracks-to-playlist

Добавить треки в существующий плейлист

get-recommendations

Получайте рекомендации на основе семенных треков

Инструкции по установке

1. Предпосылки

  • Node.js v16 или выше

  • нпм

  • Аккаунт Spotify

  • Зарегистрированное приложение Spotify Developer

2. Создайте приложение для разработчиков Spotify

  1. Перейти к панели инструментов разработчика Spotify

  2. Войдите в систему, используя свою учетную запись Spotify.

  3. Нажмите «Создать приложение».

  4. Введите название и описание приложения.

  5. Добавьте http://localhost:8888/callback в качестве URI перенаправления

  6. Запишите свой идентификатор клиента и секретный код клиента.

3. Установить проект

# Clone or download the project first
cd spotify-mcp-server

# Install dependencies
npm install

4. Получите токены Spotify

Отредактируйте файл spotify-auth.js , включив в него свой идентификатор клиента и секретный ключ клиента:

// Replace these with your Spotify app credentials
const CLIENT_ID = "your_client_id_here";
const CLIENT_SECRET = "your_client_secret_here";

Затем запустите скрипт аутентификации:

node spotify-auth.js

Это позволит:

  1. Откройте URL в вашем браузере.

  2. Предложить вам войти в Spotify

  3. Запросите разрешение на доступ к вашей учетной записи.

  4. Сохраните токены в secrets.json

5. Создайте сервер MCP

npm run build

6. Настройте рабочий стол Claude

Отредактируйте файл конфигурации Claude Desktop:

  • В macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

  • В Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json

Добавьте следующую конфигурацию:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spotify": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/full/path/to/spotify-mcp-server/build/spotify-mcp-server.js"]
    }
  }
}

Замените /full/path/to/spotify-mcp-server на фактический путь к каталогу вашего проекта.

7. Перезагрузите Claude Desktop.

Закройте и снова откройте Claude Desktop, чтобы загрузить новую конфигурацию.

Использование

Когда вы начнете разговор с Клодом, вам сначала нужно будет указать свои учетные данные Spotify:

  1. Посмотрите файл secrets.json , чтобы получить свои учетные данные.

  2. Используйте инструмент set-spotify-credentials для аутентификации

  3. Затем используйте любой другой инструмент Spotify.

Примеры подсказок

Настройка учетных данных

I want to connect to my Spotify account. Here are my credentials from secrets.json:

Tool: set-spotify-credentials
Parameters:
{
  "clientId": "your_client_id",
  "clientSecret": "your_client_secret",
  "accessToken": "your_access_token",
  "refreshToken": "your_refresh_token"
}

Основные команды

Проверьте свой аккаунт:

Can you check who I'm logged in as on Spotify?

Tool: get-current-user
Parameters: {}

Поиск треков:

Search for songs by Weekend

Tool: search-tracks
Parameters:
{
  "query": "Taylor Swift",
  "limit": 5
}

Создать плейлист:

Create a new playlist called "My Pretty pretty girlfriend"

Tool: create-playlist
Parameters:
{
  "name": "My Pretty pretty girlfriend",
  "description": "For my girlfriend. Created with Claude and the Spotify MCP server"
}

Многошаговые задачи

Создание плейлиста с песнями:

I want to create a workout playlist with energetic songs. First, search for some high-energy songs. Then create a playlist called "Workout Mix" and add those songs to it.

Получение рекомендаций на основе избранного:

I like the song "Blinding Lights" by The Weeknd. Can you search for it, then find similar songs, and create a playlist with those recommendations?

Поиск неисправностей

  • Ошибка: нет доступного токена доступа : сначала вам необходимо задать свои учетные данные с помощью инструмента set-spotify-credentials

  • Ошибки аутентификации : Ваши токены могли устареть. Запустите скрипт аутентификации еще раз, чтобы получить свежие токены

  • Неверные учетные данные : дважды проверьте, что вы используете правильный идентификатор клиента и секретный ключ клиента.

Примечания

  • Сервер хранит учетные данные только в памяти.

  • Вам нужно будет вводить учетные данные каждый раз, когда вы начинаете новый разговор.

  • Если Claude Desktop перезагрузится, вам придется снова задать учетные данные.

Available Tools

7 tools
add-tracks-to-playlistD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
playlistIdYesThe Spotify playlist ID
trackUrisYesArray of Spotify track URIs to add

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

check-credentials-statusD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

create-playlistD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
descriptionNoDescription of the playlist
nameYesName of the playlist

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-current-userD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get-recommendationsD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoNumber of recommendations to return
seedTracksYesSpotify track IDs to use as seeds (max 5)

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

search-tracksD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoNumber of results to return
queryYesSearch query for tracks

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

set-spotify-credentialsD
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
accessTokenYesThe Spotify Access Token
clientIdYesThe Spotify Client ID
clientSecretYesThe Spotify Client Secret
refreshTokenYesThe Spotify Refresh Token

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 7 tool updatesv1.0.0
    • First observedadd-tracks-to-playlist
    • First observedcheck-credentials-status
    • First observedcreate-playlist
    • First observedget-current-user
    • First observedget-recommendations
    • First observedsearch-tracks
    • First observedset-spotify-credentials

TDQS

D1.8/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different Spotify resources like playlists, user info, recommendations, and tracks, but 'add-tracks-to-playlist' and 'create-playlist' could be confused if an agent needs to both create and populate a playlist in one operation. The lack of descriptions increases minor ambiguity.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming uses a mix of verb-noun patterns (e.g., 'create-playlist', 'search-tracks') and more descriptive phrases (e.g., 'check-credentials-status', 'set-spotify-credentials'), with all tools using kebab-case. This is readable but lacks a strict, predictable convention across all tools.

Tool Count5/5

With 7 tools, this server is well-scoped for a Spotify integration, covering core functionalities like user management, playlist operations, search, and recommendations without being overwhelming or too sparse.

Completeness3/5

The toolset covers key Spotify operations like user info, search, recommendations, and playlist management, but lacks update or delete operations for playlists and tracks, and missing tools for managing playback or albums creates notable gaps in a full music streaming workflow.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    Connects Claude to Spotify for music discovery, playlist creation, and collection analysis through natural language. Enables searching songs, analyzing music diversity, creating playlists, and getting recommendations using Spotify's API.
    -