Spotify MCP Server
Servidor MCP de Spotify
Un servidor simple de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) que te permite interactuar con Spotify a través de Claude. Este servidor permite a Claude buscar canciones, crear listas de reproducción, obtener recomendaciones y mucho más usando tu cuenta de Spotify.
Características
Buscar pistas en Spotify
Ver tu perfil de Spotify
Crear listas de reproducción
Agregar pistas a listas de reproducción
Obtenga recomendaciones musicales personalizadas
Related MCP server: Spotify MCP Server
Herramientas disponibles
Nombre de la herramienta | Descripción |
| Establezca sus credenciales de autenticación de Spotify |
| Comprueba si tus credenciales son válidas y quién ha iniciado sesión |
| Busque pistas por nombre, artista o palabras clave |
| Obtén la información de tu perfil de Spotify |
| Crea una nueva lista de reproducción en tu cuenta |
| Agregar pistas a una lista de reproducción existente |
| Obtenga recomendaciones basadas en pistas de semillas |
Instrucciones de configuración
1. Requisitos previos
Node.js v16 o superior
npm
Una cuenta de Spotify
Una aplicación de desarrollador de Spotify registrada
2. Crea una aplicación para desarrolladores de Spotify
Inicia sesión con tu cuenta de Spotify
Haga clic en "Crear una aplicación"
Complete el nombre y la descripción de la aplicación.
Agregue
http://localhost:8888/callbackcomo URI de redireccionamientoAnote su ID de cliente y su secreto de cliente
3. Instalar el proyecto
# Clone or download the project first
cd spotify-mcp-server
# Install dependencies
npm install4. Consigue tus tokens de Spotify
Edite el archivo spotify-auth.js para incluir su ID de cliente y secreto de cliente:
// Replace these with your Spotify app credentials
const CLIENT_ID = "your_client_id_here";
const CLIENT_SECRET = "your_client_secret_here";Luego ejecute el script de autenticación:
node spotify-auth.jsEsto hará lo siguiente:
Abra una URL en su navegador
Le solicitará que inicie sesión en Spotify
Solicita tu permiso para acceder a tu cuenta
Guarde los tokens en
secrets.json
5. Construya el servidor MCP
npm run build6. Configurar Claude Desktop
Edite su archivo de configuración de Claude Desktop:
En macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonEn Windows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Agregue la siguiente configuración:
{
"mcpServers": {
"spotify": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/full/path/to/spotify-mcp-server/build/spotify-mcp-server.js"]
}
}
}Reemplace /full/path/to/spotify-mcp-server con la ruta real al directorio de su proyecto.
7. Reinicie Claude Desktop
Cierre y vuelva a abrir Claude Desktop para cargar la nueva configuración.
Uso
Cuando inicies una conversación con Claude, primero deberás configurar tus credenciales de Spotify:
Mira tu archivo
secrets.jsonpara obtener tus credencialesUtilice la herramienta
set-spotify-credentialspara autenticarseLuego usa cualquiera de las otras herramientas de Spotify
Ejemplos de indicaciones
Configuración de credenciales
I want to connect to my Spotify account. Here are my credentials from secrets.json:
Tool: set-spotify-credentials
Parameters:
{
"clientId": "your_client_id",
"clientSecret": "your_client_secret",
"accessToken": "your_access_token",
"refreshToken": "your_refresh_token"
}Comandos básicos
Revisa tu cuenta:
Can you check who I'm logged in as on Spotify?
Tool: get-current-user
Parameters: {}Buscar pistas:
Search for songs by Weekend
Tool: search-tracks
Parameters:
{
"query": "Taylor Swift",
"limit": 5
}Crear una lista de reproducción:
Create a new playlist called "My Pretty pretty girlfriend"
Tool: create-playlist
Parameters:
{
"name": "My Pretty pretty girlfriend",
"description": "For my girlfriend. Created with Claude and the Spotify MCP server"
}Tareas de varios pasos
Creando una lista de reproducción con canciones:
I want to create a workout playlist with energetic songs. First, search for some high-energy songs. Then create a playlist called "Workout Mix" and add those songs to it.Obtener recomendaciones basadas en favoritos:
I like the song "Blinding Lights" by The Weeknd. Can you search for it, then find similar songs, and create a playlist with those recommendations?Solución de problemas
Error: No hay token de acceso disponible : primero debe configurar sus credenciales usando la herramienta
set-spotify-credentialsErrores de autenticación : Es posible que sus tokens hayan expirado. Vuelva a ejecutar el script de autenticación para obtener tokens nuevos.
Credenciales no válidas : Verifique que esté utilizando el ID de cliente y el secreto de cliente correctos
Notas
El servidor almacena las credenciales sólo en la memoria
Necesitarás establecer credenciales cada vez que inicies una nueva conversación
Si Claude Desktop se reinicia, deberá configurar las credenciales nuevamente
Available Tools
7 toolsadd-tracks-to-playlistD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| playlistId | Yes | The Spotify playlist ID | |
| trackUris | Yes | Array of Spotify track URIs to add |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
check-credentials-statusD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
create-playlistD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | No | Description of the playlist | |
| name | Yes | Name of the playlist |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-current-userD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-recommendationsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of recommendations to return | |
| seedTracks | Yes | Spotify track IDs to use as seeds (max 5) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search-tracksD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of results to return | |
| query | Yes | Search query for tracks |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
set-spotify-credentialsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| accessToken | Yes | The Spotify Access Token | |
| clientId | Yes | The Spotify Client ID | |
| clientSecret | Yes | The Spotify Client Secret | |
| refreshToken | Yes | The Spotify Refresh Token |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
7 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
add-tracks-to-playlist - First observed
check-credentials-status - First observed
create-playlist - First observed
get-current-user - First observed
get-recommendations - First observed
search-tracks - First observed
set-spotify-credentials
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different Spotify resources like playlists, user info, recommendations, and tracks, but 'add-tracks-to-playlist' and 'create-playlist' could be confused if an agent needs to both create and populate a playlist in one operation. The lack of descriptions increases minor ambiguity.
The naming uses a mix of verb-noun patterns (e.g., 'create-playlist', 'search-tracks') and more descriptive phrases (e.g., 'check-credentials-status', 'set-spotify-credentials'), with all tools using kebab-case. This is readable but lacks a strict, predictable convention across all tools.
With 7 tools, this server is well-scoped for a Spotify integration, covering core functionalities like user management, playlist operations, search, and recommendations without being overwhelming or too sparse.
The toolset covers key Spotify operations like user info, search, recommendations, and playlist management, but lacks update or delete operations for playlists and tracks, and missing tools for managing playback or albums creates notable gaps in a full music streaming workflow.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Full Spotify Web API coverage - albums, artists, playlists, player controls, and more.
Generate AI music via the Lacuna Music API from MCP clients like Claude Desktop & Code.
Spotify: Spotify Data API for Millions of songs & podcasts, artists, albums, playlists and more.
Connect Claude to your Platform7n workspaces: chat, links, work and decks. One-click OAuth.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude with Spotify to control playback, search music, get track information, and manage the queue through conversation.1-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnects Claude with Spotify, allowing users to control playback, search for music, get track/artist information, and manage the queue via the Spotify API.51-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceConnects Claude to Spotify for music discovery, playlist creation, and collection analysis through natural language. Enables searching songs, analyzing music diversity, creating playlists, and getting recommendations using Spotify's API.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to control Spotify features including playback control, playlist management, search, and accessing user's listening history and preferences through the Spotify API.1ISC