dsh-tools-mcp
dsh-tools-mcp
Извлекает и оборачивает инструменты минимального режима (minimal) и стандартного режима (standard) из deepseek-harness (открытый agent harness от DeepSeek AI) в сервер MCP (Model Context Protocol), управляя тем, какой набор инструментов будет доступен, через параметр --mode.
Схемы инструментов, описания и выходные обёртки (например, формат
<path>/<type>/<content>дляread, семантика view/create/str_replace/insert дляstr_replace_editor, маркер[exit code: N]) точно воспроизведены из файлаapps/cli/config/agent-presets/{minimal,standard}/agent.cordis.ymlисходного репозитория и соответствующих реализацийpackages/*/tool-*.
Режимы и соответствие инструментов
Режим | Параметр | Инструменты |
Минимальный режим |
| Постоянный shell ( |
Стандартный режим |
|
|
Стандартный режим также поддерживает --with-web-fetch для дополнительного раскрытия web_fetch (в оригинальном стандартном пресете по умолчанию fetch: false).
Related MCP server: deepseek-agent-mcp
Быстрый старт
cd dsh-tools-mcp
npm install
npm run build # 输出到 dist/
# 极简模式
node dist/index.js --mode minimal --cwd D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcp
# 标准模式
node dist/index.js --mode standard --cwd D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcpКонфигурация MCP-клиента
// mcp.json / WorkBuddy 自定义连接器
{
"mcpServers": {
"dsh-minimal": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcp/dist/index.js", "--mode", "minimal", "--cwd", "D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcp"]
},
"dsh-standard": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcp/dist/index.js", "--mode", "standard", "--cwd", "D:/develop/project/dsh-tools-mcp"]
}
}
}Обе точки входа можно зарегистрировать одновременно, выбирая минимальный/стандартный набор инструментов по необходимости.
Все параметры
--mode <minimal|standard> Agent 预设模式(默认 minimal)
--cwd <path> 工作区根目录,文件工具基于它解析相对路径(默认 process.cwd())
--shell <auto|bash|pwsh> shell 后端;auto = win32 用 pwsh,其余用 bash
--shell-timeout-ms <n> 持久 shell 单条命令超时(默认 300000)
--max-output-chars <n> 输出截断上限(默认 16000)
--skills-dir <path> 启用 skill 工具,扫描该目录下的 SKILL.md 子目录
--search-provider <duckduckgo|tavily|bing> web 搜索后端(默认 duckduckgo)
--search-api-key <key> tavily/bing 的 API key
--proxy <url> web 工具的 HTTP(S) 代理,如 http://127.0.0.1:7897
--with-web-fetch 额外暴露 web_fetch
--allow-outside-root 允许文件工具访问 --cwd 之外的路径(默认禁止)
--tools <a,b,c> 显式指定工具/套件清单覆盖模式(见下)
--help / --versionПереопределение --tools
--tools принимает имена инструментов или наборов, раскрывая подмножество по необходимости:
# 只要文件相关
node dist/index.js --mode standard --tools read,write,edit,glob,grep
# 只要极简模式的编辑器 + 后台任务
node dist/index.js --mode minimal --tools str_replace_editor,job_output,job_list,job_killИмена наборов: shell (постоянный shell), one-shot, fs, search, jobs, todo, web, ask-user, goal, plan, skill.
Примечания по дизайну
Постоянный shell: без зависимости от node-pty, использует stdio-каналы для управления долгоживущим дочерним процессом
bash/powershell; команды оборачиваются маркерами со случайным UUID для надёжного захвата статуса завершения и кода выхода; состояниеcd/exportсохраняется между вызовами; автоматический сброс при таймауте или выходе из shell (семантика соответствует оригинальномуtool-bash-persistent).Безопасность путей: по умолчанию файловые инструменты разрешают доступ только к путям внутри рабочей области
--cwd; при выходе за пределы выдаётся ошибка с подсказкой добавить--allow-outside-root.web_search по умолчанию использует DuckDuckGo (без ключа); для сетей в Китае рекомендуется
--proxy http://127.0.0.1:7897или замена на--search-provider tavily --search-api-key <key>.Всё состояние внутри процесса (на уровне сессии): состояние todo/goal/plan/фоновых задач привязано к жизненному циклу процесса сервера и очищается при перезапуске — эквивалентно «состоянию уровня сессии» оригинала.
Отличия от оригинального dsh (явное пояснение)
Пункт | Оригинальный dsh | Данная MCP-обёртка |
Постоянный shell | Терминал PTY node-pty | Долгоживущий процесс через stdio-каналы (без интерактивного приглашения, состояние эквивалентно) |
| Мост вопросов в UI dsh | При MCP stdio невозможна синхронная интеракция; возвращает текст вопроса и указывает модели пересказать его пользователю |
| Поток утверждения в UI | Флаг на сервере + возврат текста плана |
subagent_*/workflow/ralph | Зависит от рантайма dsh (LLM-субагенты, движок рабочих процессов) | Не обёрнуты — требуется полный рантайм dsh, см. ниже |
Движок grep | Встроенный бинарник ripgrep | Реализация на node-регулярных выражениях (эквивалентна для распространённого синтаксиса, часть возможностей ripgrep не поддерживается) |
Не обёрнутые инструменты (инструменты, связанные с рантаймом в оригинальном standard preset, требуют полный dsh runtime): subagent_control, list_agents, subagent, subagent_fork, workflow, ralph. Если нужны эти возможности, используйте сам deepseek-harness.
Тестирование
npm run build
npm test # 冒烟测试:两种模式工具暴露 + 核心工具行为 + --tools 覆写
node scripts/state-test.mjs # 持久 shell 状态保持 / 退出码 / 优雅重置(PROXY=... 可测 web_search)
node scripts/bash-test.mjs # bash 后端验证Ссылки на исходный код
Извлечено из deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness (лицензия MIT, ветка master):
Определения режимов:
apps/cli/config/agent-presets/minimal/agent.cordis.yml,.../standard/agent.cordis.ymlРеализации инструментов:
packages/shell/tool-bash-persistent,packages/fs/tool-str-replace-editor,packages/fs/tool-fs,packages/fs/tool-fs-search,packages/jobs/tool-jobs,packages/todo/tool-todo,packages/web/tool-web,packages/interaction/tool-ask-user,packages/goal/tool-goal,packages/plan/plan-mode,packages/skill/tool-skillи др.
Available Tools
2 toolsbashA
Run commands in a persistent shell. State, including the current directory and exported environment variables, persists across calls for this agent.
You don't have access to the internet via this tool.
State is persistent across command calls and discussions with the user.
To inspect a particular line range of a file, e.g. lines 10-25, try 'sed -n 10,25p /path/to/the/file'.
Please avoid commands that may produce a very large amount of output.
Please run long lived commands in the background, e.g. 'sleep 10 &' or start a server in the background.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| command | Yes | The bash command to run. Relative path is preferred in the command. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly states that state persists across calls (including directory and env vars), that there is no internet access, and that state persists across discussions. It also discloses constraints and recommendations (avoid large output, run background commands) and suggests a specific technique (sed). This is rich, transparent behavior description beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise and well-structured, starting with the core purpose and then presenting bullet-pointed usage tips. It has a slight redundancy: 'State is persistent across command calls and discussions with the user' repeats the initial statement about persistence. However, the overall structure is clear and front-loads the most important information without wasting words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's flexibility and only one parameter, the description covers key operational aspects: persistence, network capabilities, output handling, and background execution. It does not mention exit codes or the format of command output, which could be useful, but for a general shell tool the guidance is sufficient for an agent to use it effectively. The absence of an output schema is partially mitigated by the description's behavioral notes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers the single 'command' parameter fully, providing its type and a note about relative paths. The description adds value by offering practical guidance on how to construct commands: using sed for line inspection, avoiding excessive output, and handling long-running processes. This enriches the parameter's usage semantics beyond the schema, earning a score above the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Run commands in a persistent shell,' specifying the verb (run), resource (commands in a shell), and a key behavioral trait (persistence). It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool str_replace_editor, which is for file editing, making it a precise and unambiguous purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for usage: it mentions the shell is persistent, warns about no internet access, advises avoiding large output, and recommends running long-lived commands in the background. Though it doesn't explicitly compare with alternatives, the context and tips implicitly guide appropriate use. It doesn't state when not to use this tool, but the guidance is practical and specific.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
str_replace_editorA
Custom editing tool for viewing, creating and editing files
State is persistent across command calls and discussions with the user
If
pathis a file,viewdisplays the result of applyingcat -n. Ifpathis a directory,viewlists non-hidden files and directories up to 2 levels deepThe
createcommand cannot be used if the specifiedpathalready exists as a fileIf a
commandgenerates a long output, it will be truncated and marked with<response clipped>
Notes for using the str_replace command:
The
old_strparameter should match EXACTLY one or more consecutive lines from the original file. Be mindful of whitespaces!If the
old_strparameter is not unique in the file, the replacement will not be performed. Make sure to include enough context inold_strto make it uniqueThe
new_strparameter should contain the edited lines that should replace theold_str
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Absolute path to file or directory, e.g. `/repo/file.py` or `/repo`. | |
| command | Yes | The commands to run. Allowed options are: `view`, `create`, `str_replace`, `insert`. | |
| new_str | No | Optional parameter of `str_replace` command containing the new string (if not given, no string will be added). Required parameter of `insert` command containing the string to insert. | |
| old_str | No | Required parameter of `str_replace` command containing the string in `path` to replace. | |
| file_text | No | Required parameter of `create` command, with the content of the file to be created. | |
| view_range | No | Optional parameter of `view` command when `path` points to a file. If none is given, the full file is shown. If provided, the file will be shown in the indicated line number range, e.g. [11, 12] will show lines 11 and 12. Indexing at 1 to start. Setting `[start_line, -1]` shows all lines from `start_line` to the end of the file. | |
| insert_line | No | Required parameter of `insert` command. The `new_str` will be inserted AFTER the line `insert_line` of `path`. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Transparency is high: no annotations are present, so the description takes the full burden. Detailed behavioral information is abundant, exposing persistence, the behavior of view when file vs. directory, the inability to create an existing file, truncation of long outputs with the marker, and the exact conditions of str_replace.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The text is long, but structured with sections and command-scoped notes. It is organized by command, then by operational notes (view, insert, str_replace) with clear field labels. The amount of detail useful is given by the complexity of the tool, and is not verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
There is no output scheme, but the description provides a complete operational picture even without a return description: command list, state persistence, file vs directory behavior in view, truncation of long output, create and insert restrictions, and the str_replace disambiguation rules are all present. Well covered for a tool that accepts many parameters and custom states.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Although the input schema already covers 100% of the parameters, the descriptions go further with practical semantics: for str_replace, old_str refers to exact/consecutive line matching and uniqueness; new_str is optional semantics; file_text is used in create; view_range explains mixed ranges with 1-based indexing and -1 sentinel; insert_line includes his post-insertion rule.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description opens with specific verb and resource ('custom editing tool for viewing, creating and editing files'), then lists the four commands (view, create, str_replace, insert) with their exact semantics. Its 'custom editing tool' framing distinguishes it from a generic bash/shell tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly defines what the tool does and explains each command's role. The directives include operational caveats (persistent state, directory vs. file output of view, no overwrite on create, output truncation marker) and dedicated notes on how to use str_replace (exact line match, uniqueness requirement, whitespace sensitivity). These rules are stated directly in the tool description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
bash - First observed
str_replace_editor
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Both tools are generic and overlap heavily in purpose: bash executes commands, while str_replace_editor edits files—but an agent could easily misuse bash for file edits (it can) or misuse str_replace_editor for shell commands (it cannot). The boundary is unclear, and each tool's descriptions do not clearly delineate when to use one over the other.
The names 'bash' and 'str_replace_editor' follow no consistent convention; one is a single-word executable name, the other is a multi-underscore compound. There is no verb_noun pattern, and the names are descriptive but not aligned. However, they are not chaotic, so a score of 2 is appropriate.
With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a general-purpose 'dsh-tools' server. Two tools can be sufficient if they cover the domain, but here the domain is broad (shell + file editing), and the count is too low to be considered well-scoped for the apparent purpose.
The tool surface lacks any file reading dedicated tool, any process management tool, or any other common operations. While bash can compensate, there are no explicit tools for listing files, searching, or managing processes. The set is far from covering typical developer tasks, though it covers the basics of shell and file editing.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Hosted MCP server connecting claude.ai, ChatGPT and other AI apps to your own computer
Hosted MCP server and Agent Skills for specs, engineering threads, and project memory.
Nifty's MCP server — exposes tasks, projects, messages, and files as tools for AI agents.
Remote MCP server exposing your Node Command fleet (files, shell, processes, browser) to AI hosts.
1
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps DeepSeek's AI capabilities into standard MCP tools, supporting three authentication modes including free web-based usage without API keys.6518 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that packages DeepSeek agents as callable tools, offering a bare model for quick Q&A and a full agent capable of executing real coding and file-modifying tasks in a workspace.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes DeepSeek Harness agent capabilities as an MCP server, letting any MCP client drive Harness to execute real coding tasks with structured results, context isolation, and parallel execution.100 npm13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTurns DeepSeek Harness into an MCP server with tools for session management, agent execution, resources, and OAuth, plus browser automation and GitHub/GitLab integration.67 npm20MIT