F
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that packages DeepSeek agents as callable tools, offering a bare model for quick Q&A and a full agent capable of executing real coding and file-modifying tasks in a workspace.
2
-
dsh-tools-mcp
by hqzqaq
Related Servers
Alternatives to dsh-tools-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing persistent bash and str_replace_editor tools from deepseek-harness's minimal agent preset, enabling file editing and shell command execution for external agents via stdio.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server bridging ChatGPT to DeepSeek Harness, exposing 13 tools for task submission, status tracking, result retrieval, project/session management, and human-in-the-loop approvals.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTurns DeepSeek Harness into an MCP server with tools for session management, agent execution, resources, and OAuth, plus browser automation and GitHub/GitLab integration.67 npm20MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps DeepSeek's AI capabilities into standard MCP tools, supporting three authentication modes including free web-based usage without API keys.6614 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes DeepSeek Harness agent capabilities as an MCP server, letting any MCP client drive Harness to execute real coding tasks with structured results, context isolation, and parallel execution.156 npm11MIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation1/5
Both tools are generic and overlap heavily in purpose: bash executes commands, while str_replace_editor edits files—but an agent could easily misuse bash for file edits (it can) or misuse str_replace_editor for shell commands (it cannot). The boundary is unclear, and each tool's descriptions do not clearly delineate when to use one over the other.
Naming Consistency2/5
The names 'bash' and 'str_replace_editor' follow no consistent convention; one is a single-word executable name, the other is a multi-underscore compound. There is no verb_noun pattern, and the names are descriptive but not aligned. However, they are not chaotic, so a score of 2 is appropriate.
Tool Count2/5
With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a general-purpose 'dsh-tools' server. Two tools can be sufficient if they cover the domain, but here the domain is broad (shell + file editing), and the count is too low to be considered well-scoped for the apparent purpose.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface lacks any file reading dedicated tool, any process management tool, or any other common operations. While bash can compensate, there are no explicit tools for listing files, searching, or managing processes. The set is far from covering typical developer tasks, though it covers the basics of shell and file editing.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues