Skip to main content
Glama
howardpen9

kimi-code-mcp

by howardpen9
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to kimi-code-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kimi MCP Server

      MichaelCecil
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP bridge that enables Claude Code to consult the Kimi AI model in a structured challenge-loop for code review, debugging, and architecture evaluation.
      29 npm
      2
      MIT

    • Ollama MCP Server

      Jadael
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to delegate coding tasks to local Ollama models, reducing API token usage by up to 98.75% while leveraging local compute resources. Supports code generation, review, refactoring, and file analysis with Claude providing oversight and quality assurance.
      475 npm
      25
      AGPL 3.0

    • mcp-relay

      mhcoen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude Desktop and Claude Code, enabling autonomous exchange of messages, files, and code while keeping their context windows separate.
      4
      MIT

    • kimi-acp-mcp

      TuTouPower
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Bridges Claude Code to Kimi Code via MCP, enabling task delegation with file and command execution.
      3
      MIT

    • Deep Code Reasoning MCP Server

      dx-corp
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pairs Claude Code with Google's Gemini AI for complementary code analysis, enabling intelligent routing where Claude handles local-context operations while Gemini leverages its 1M token context for distributed system debugging and long-trace analysis.
      10
      109
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: listing sessions, analyzing codebase, querying without context, independent verification, cache management, resuming sessions, and status checking. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'kimi_verb' pattern using snake_case (e.g., kimi_analyze, kimi_cache_status). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools covering session management, analysis, verification, and cache control, the count is well-scoped for a code analysis assistant—neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core workflows (analysis, resume, verification, cache, status). A minor gap is the lack of an explicit session deletion tool, but the provided tools enable effective operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources