Skip to main content
Glama

kimi-code-mcp

English | 中文說明



Delegate codebase analysis from Claude to Kimi Code (default model k3, CLI alias kimi-code/k3) — cut Claude-side token cost ~90%.

Task

Claude only

Claude + kimi-code-mcp

Claude-side savings

Analyze 200-file monorepo

~250K tok

~25K tok

~90%

Summarize 50-page RFC PDF

~60K tok

~6K tok

~90% (sketch)

Cross-reference 100 commits

~80K tok

~8K tok

~90% (sketch)

*Illustrative estimates — savings are on Claude tokens only and depend on the task; Kimi's subscription cost is separate. See Token Economics.

Quick start

# 1. Install the current Kimi Code CLI (macOS / Linux) and log in.
#    code.kimi.com/install.sh redirects to the archived Python kimi-cli. Do not use it.
curl -fsSL https://code.kimi.com/kimi-code/install.sh | bash
kimi login

# Node.js >= 22.19.0 alternative:
# npm install -g @moonshot-ai/kimi-code

# This server runs ~/.local/bin/kimi only. The installer puts the binary in
# ~/.kimi-code/bin and adds that directory to your shell rc.
mkdir -p "$HOME/.local/bin"
ln -sfn "$HOME/.kimi-code/bin/kimi" "$HOME/.local/bin/kimi"

# 2. Install this MCP server (Node.js >= 18)
npm install -g kimi-mcp-server
WARNING

On 2026-11-02 the npm registry only haskimi-mcp-server@0.3.0. Git main is 0.5.0 and is not published, so npm install -g does not yet default to k3 or read ~/.kimi-code/config.toml. Use Install from source until 0.5.0 is published if you need the behavior on this page.

Windows (PowerShell): irm https://code.kimi.com/kimi-code/install.ps1 | iex. The runner in this repo still expects the POSIX path ~/.local/bin/kimi, so link the installed kimi binary there the same way.

Project scope — commit .mcp.json at the repo root:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kimi-code": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "kimi-mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

User scope (all projects, stored in ~/.claude.json, not ~/.claude/mcp.json):

claude mcp add --scope user --transport stdio kimi-code -- npx -y kimi-mcp-server

Run /mcp in Claude Code to verify — you should see kimi-code with 8 tools.

The MCP defaults to k3 and passes -m kimi-code/k3 on CLI calls. Override with the tool's model argument or KIMICODE_MODEL / KIMI_MODEL (argument wins). On CLI 2.4.1, kimi provider list prints Default model: … when a default is set. That value can differ from the MCP default. Switch inside the CLI with /model.

TIP

You don't need the CLI for the common case. kimi_query and kimi_verify call the Kimi Code API directly — no CLI install or kimi login required. Set $KIMICODE_API_KEY (see Kimi Code API Setup). Only kimi_analyze and kimi_resume spawn the CLI. See Two backends: API vs CLI.

Related MCP server: Ollama MCP Server

How it works

  1. Claude calls the kimi_analyze tool when a task needs bulk codebase reading.

  2. MCP routes the request to Kimi Code (default -m kimi-code/k3) — Kimi reads the codebase from disk.

  3. The result is piped back as a structured response — Claude acts on it with precise, targeted edits.

┌──────────────┐  stdio/MCP   ┌──────────────┐  subprocess   ┌──────────────┐
│  Claude Code │ ◄──────────► │ kimi-code-mcp│ ────────────► │ Kimi CLI     │
│  (conductor) │              │ (MCP server) │               │ (k3)         │
└──────────────┘              └──────────────┘               └──────────────┘

Two backends: API vs CLI

The server reaches Kimi two different ways, and each tool uses the one that fits its job. Knowing which is which tells you what you need to set up.

Backend

How it talks to Kimi

What it needs

Sees your codebase?

Direct API

HTTPS to api.kimi.com/coding/v1 (or KIMI_BASE_URL)

An API key ($KIMICODE_API_KEY, or api_key in ~/.kimi/config.toml / ~/.kimi-code/config.toml)

❌ No — you paste in the context

Local CLI

Spawns the kimi binary as a subprocess

CLI installed and kimi login done

✅ Yes — reads files from disk

Tool

Backend

Why

kimi_query

API (CLI only if no key configured)

Contextless Q&A — no codebase needed, so the API is simpler and has no login dependency

kimi_verify

API

You pass the code/diff/claim inline; Kimi judges it as an independent third party

kimi_analyze

CLI

Reads the codebase from disk. Context follows the model window

kimi_resume

CLI

Continues a stateful CLI session that holds prior codebase context

kimi_list_sessions, kimi_cache_*, kimi_status

local

Read local session/cache metadata

IMPORTANT

Most users only need the API key. If you just want a second opinion / verification (kimi_query, kimi_verify), set the API key and you're done — skip the CLI entirely. Install + kimi login only when you want Kimi to read your codebase via kimi_analyze / kimi_resume.

Run kimi_status any time to see which backends are live — it reports the API-configured state and the CLI install/auth state separately.

Guidelines for agents

If you are an AI agent (Claude Code, a subagent, etc.) deciding when to call these tools:

  • Cross-check your own work before committing → kimi_verify. Paste the actual diff/code/claim plus the surrounding context (goal, constraints, signatures). Kimi sees only the context string — no repo, no session history. Vague context → useless review.

  • Quick model-agnostic programming question → kimi_query. No codebase needed. Returns a different model's opinion.

  • Need to understand a large/unfamiliar codebase → kimi_analyze with work_dir. Prefer this over reading 50 files yourself; it's ~10× cheaper in Claude tokens. Requires the CLI to be installed and logged in.

  • Drill deeper after an analyze → kimi_resume with the returned session_id (the CLI session keeps its context; the window is the model's, not a fixed 256K).

  • Don't know why a Kimi call failed → kimi_status first. "Not authenticated" on the CLI does not affect kimi_query/kimi_verify (those use the API).

  • Keep outputs lean. The tool default is detail_level: normal. Pass summary for orientation; use detailed only when you need code snippets. Bigger output = more Claude tokens, defeating the purpose.

  • Skip Kimi for small/single-file work — Claude reading directly is faster under ~10 files.


MCP server that connects Kimi Code (default model k3) with Claude Code — letting Claude orchestrate while Kimi handles the heavy reading.

TIP

Stop paying Claude to read files. Kimi Code delivers frontier-class code intelligence at a fraction of the cost (see chart above). Delegate bulk codebase scanning to Kimi and let Claude focus on reasoning, decisions, and precise edits. One kimi_analyze call can replace 50+ file reads.

What is Kimi Code?

Kimi Code is Moonshot AI's coding agent (terminal, IDE, and Kimi Code CLI). The CLI is the TypeScript package @moonshot-ai/kimi-code. Public docs list CLI 2.4.1 (2026-10-30). It reads and edits code, runs shell commands, searches files, and fetches web pages.

Model ids below are from the Kimi Code model page and the alias prefix shipped in CLI 2.4.1 (kimi-code/<id> for the managed provider). Context is plan-dependent ("up to").

Model ID

CLI alias

What it is

Context

k3

kimi-code/k3

K3. This MCP's default.

up to 1,048,576

k3-256k

kimi-code/k3-256k

K3, 256K window

262,144

k3.1-pro

kimi-code/k3.1-pro

K3.1 Pro (3T-class, thinking only)

up to 1,048,576

k3.1-pro-highspeed

kimi-code/k3.1-pro-highspeed

Same model, higher speed, about 2× quota

up to 1,048,576

kimi-for-coding

kimi-code/kimi-for-coding

K2.8 Preview

up to 1,048,576

kimi-for-coding-highspeed

kimi-code/kimi-for-coding-highspeed

K2.7 Code Highspeed

262,144

This server rewrites only a short alias table before the call:

You pass

API model

CLI -m

k3, kimi-code/k3, kimi-k3

k3

kimi-code/k3

kimi-for-coding, kimi-code/kimi-for-coding, k2.7

kimi-for-coding

kimi-code/kimi-for-coding

anything else (k3-256k, k3.1-pro, kimi-code/k3.1-pro, …)

the string unchanged

the same string unchanged

k2.7 is a leftover shortcut. It still sends kimi-for-coding (K2.8 Preview), not kimi-for-coding-highspeed. For any other id, the API wants the bare id and the CLI wants kimi-code/<id>. One model value cannot be both unless it is in the table above. Check kimi provider list or /model after login; a re-login can drop custom aliases.

WARNING

Kimi Code membership required. API tools (kimi_query, kimi_verify) need an API key. Codebase tools (kimi_analyze, kimi_resume) need the CLI on ~/.local/bin/kimi and kimi login. Plans and quotas: kimi.com/code.

Install from source

If you prefer to build locally instead of using the npm package:

git clone https://github.com/howardpen9/kimi-code-mcp.git
cd kimi-code-mcp && npm install && npm run build
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kimi-code": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/kimi-code-mcp/dist/index.js"]
    }
  }
}

Kimi Code API Setup

NOTE

Kimi Code and the Kimi Platform (Moonshot) are separate. Coding-plan ids (k3, kimi-for-coding) are not platform ids (kimi-k3, kimi-k3.1-pro). kimi-k2-0905-preview is discontinued. Keys are not interchangeable.

CLI login and the direct API key are separate. kimi login does not give kimi_query / kimi_verify a key.

Option 1: OAuth login (CLI tools)

kimi login

This is the device-code flow (same credentials as /login in the TUI). The CLI writes config, sessions, and OAuth under ~/.kimi-code/ (KIMI_CODE_HOME overrides that directory). Legacy data may still sit in ~/.kimi. After login, kimi provider list prints Default model: when one is set. It may not be kimi-code/k3. The managed provider id is managed:kimi-code.

NOTE

command not found: kimi? The current installer writes ~/.kimi-code/bin/kimi and appends that directory to your shell rc. Open a new shell, or source the rc file it printed. This MCP does not search PATH. It only executes ~/.local/bin/kimi:

mkdir -p "$HOME/.local/bin"
ln -sfn "$(command -v kimi)" "$HOME/.local/bin/kimi"

Use that link after either the install script or npm install -g @moonshot-ai/kimi-code.

Option 2: API key (direct API tools)

Create a key in the Kimi Code console. The MCP checks KIMICODE_API_KEY, then KIMI_CODE_API_KEY, then KIMI_API_KEY. KIMI_BASE_URL overrides the endpoint (default https://api.kimi.com/coding/v1; overseas coding host is https://api.kimi.ai/coding/v1).

# ~/.zshrc or ~/.bashrc — this process must see it (Claude's MCP env, not only an interactive shell)
export KIMICODE_API_KEY="sk-your-api-key"
# export KIMI_BASE_URL="https://api.kimi.ai/coding/v1"

The CLI does not read KIMICODE_API_KEY from the environment. For the CLI, use kimi login, or set api_key / api_key_env in ~/.kimi-code/config.toml. The MCP does not read api_key_env. It does expand ${VAR} inside a quoted api_key when it parses TOML.

Config search order: $KIMI_SHARE_DIR/config.toml (if set), ~/.kimi/config.toml, then ~/.kimi-code/config.toml. Only api_key and base_url under a [providers.*] table are used. default_model and the [models.*] table do not change the MCP's model.

If you keep the key in the file instead of the environment, the current CLI shape is:

default_model = "kimi-code/k3"

[providers."managed:kimi-code"]
type = "kimi"
base_url = "https://api.kimi.com/coding/v1"
api_key = "sk-your-api-key"

Do not paste that over a file kimi login already manages. An empty api_key = "" plus an oauth table is normal after login and is not a key this MCP can use. Prefer KIMICODE_API_KEY for the API tools.

Kimi Code vs Kimi Platform

Kimi Code (this MCP)

Kimi Platform

Endpoint

https://api.kimi.com/coding/v1 (overseas https://api.kimi.ai/coding/v1)

Platform host, not the coding path

Model ids

k3, k3-256k, k3.1-pro, kimi-for-coding, …

kimi-k3, kimi-k3.1-pro, …

Keys

Kimi Code console

platform.kimi.ai models

What You Can Do

Just tell Claude what you need. It will delegate to Kimi automatically:

Prompt

What happens

"Analyze this codebase's architecture"

Kimi reads the tree (default k3), Claude acts on the report

"Scan for security vulnerabilities, then review Kimi's findings"

Kimi audits, Claude cross-examines — AI pair review

"Map all dependencies of the auth module, then plan the refactoring"

Kimi builds the dependency graph, Claude plans the changes

"Review the recent changes for regressions and edge cases"

Kimi reviews full context (not just the diff), Claude synthesizes

"Resume the last Kimi session and ask about the API design"

kimi_resume continues that CLI session

Why This Exists

Claude Code is powerful but expensive. Every file it reads costs tokens. Meanwhile, many tasks — pre-reviewing large codebases, scanning for patterns, generating audit reports — are high-certainty work that doesn't need Claude's full reasoning power.

IMPORTANT

The cost equation: Claude reads 50 files to understand your architecture = expensive. Kimi reads those files via kimi_analyze on the Kimi plan, not on Claude tokens. Claude then acts on the report. About 60-80% fewer Claude tokens on analysis-heavy tasks. The ~90% in the chart is an illustration, not a measured total.

How It Saves Tokens

                          ┌─────────────────────────────┐
                          │   You (the developer)       │
                          └──────────┬──────────────────┘
                                     │ prompt
                                     ▼
                          ┌─────────────────────────────┐
                          │   Claude Code (conductor)   │
                          │   - orchestrates workflow    │
                          │   - makes decisions          │
                          │   - writes & edits code      │
                          └──────┬──────────────┬───────┘
                      precise    │              │  delegate
                      edits      │              │  bulk reading
                      (tokens)   │              │  (Kimi plan)
                                 ▼              ▼
                          ┌──────────┐   ┌──────────────┐
                          │ your     │   │  Kimi Code   │
                          │ codebase │   │  - model k3  │
                          └──────────┘   │  - reads all │
                                         │  - reports   │
                                         └──────────────┘
  1. Claude receives your task → decides it needs codebase understanding

  2. Claude calls kimi_analyze via MCP → Kimi reads the codebase (subscription cost, not Claude tokens)

  3. Kimi returns a structured analysis

  4. Claude acts on the analysis with precise, targeted edits

Result: Claude only spends tokens on decision-making and code writing, not on reading files.

Mutual Code Review with Kimi Code

The default model is k3 (K3). That is enough context for AI pair review:

  1. Kimi pre-reviews — one pass over the tree: security issues, anti-patterns, dead code, architectural problems

  2. Claude cross-examines — reviews Kimi's findings, challenges questionable items, adds its own insights

  3. Two perspectives — different models catch different things. What one misses, the other finds

Use Kimi as a Code Reviewer

Beyond ad-hoc analysis, you can use Kimi as a dedicated reviewer in your workflow:

PR Review Workflow

┌──────────────┐   diff    ┌──────────────┐  structured  ┌──────────────┐
│   Your PR    │ ────────► │  Kimi Code   │  findings    │  Claude Code │
│  (changes)   │           │  (reviewer)  │ ────────────►│  (decision)  │
└──────────────┘           └──────────────┘              └──────────────┘

Continuous Audit Pattern

When

What

Why

Before merging

Kimi scans diff + affected modules

Catch regressions early

Weekly

Full codebase sweep

Accumulated tech debt

Pre-release

Security-focused audit

Ship with confidence

Each review session can be resumed (kimi_resume) if you have its CLI session id. Context follows that session's model window.

What Kimi Reviews Well

Review Type

Why Kimi Excels

Security audit

The model window covers the tree, not one file

Dead code detection

Can trace imports/exports across entire codebase

API consistency

Compares patterns across all endpoints simultaneously

Dependency analysis

Maps full dependency graph in one pass

Architecture review

Sees the forest and the trees at the same time

Tools

Tool

Description

Timeout

kimi_analyze

CLI — deep codebase analysis (architecture, audit, refactoring)

10 min

kimi_query

API — quick programming questions, no codebase context (CLI only if no key configured)

2 min

kimi_verify

API — independent third-party verification of code/diffs/claims; no CLI required, context-driven

5 min

kimi_list_sessions

List legacy ~/.kimi/sessions metadata (not ~/.kimi-code)

instant

kimi_resume

CLI — resume a session with -S <id>

10 min

kimi_status

API key state, plus CLI version/auth from ~/.local/bin/kimi and ~/.kimi

instant

kimi_cache_status

View session cache statistics and performance metrics

instant

kimi_cache_invalidate

Manually invalidate cached sessions (by dir or all)

instant

Output Control Parameters

kimi_analyze and kimi_resume support these parameters to control output size:

Parameter

Values

Default

Effect

detail_level

summary / normal / detailed

normal

Controls prompt-side verbosity instructions

max_output_tokens

number

15000

Hard ceiling — output truncated at clean boundary if exceeded

include_thinking

boolean

false

Include Kimi's internal reasoning chain (10-30K extra tokens)

kimi_query also supports max_output_tokens and include_thinking.

Token Economics

NOTE

The savings come fromcompression ratio, not from free reading. Kimi's subscription cost still applies, but the key benefit is reducing expensive Claude Code token consumption.

                    Without kimi-code-mcp        With kimi-code-mcp (normal)
                    ─────────────────────        ───────────────────────────
Raw source:         50 files × ~4K = 200K        Kimi reads (subscription cost)
Claude reads:       200K tokens                  5-15K token report
Claude token cost:  $$$                          $

Compression ratio by detail_level:

Level

Compression

Output Size

Equivalent Source

Best For

summary

40-100x

~2-5K tokens

~8-20K chars / ~200-500 lines of code

Quick orientation, file inventory

normal

15-40x

~5-15K tokens

~20-60K chars / ~500-1500 lines of code

Architecture review, dependency mapping

detailed

5-15x

~15-40K tokens

~60-160K chars / ~1500-4000 lines of code

Security audit with code snippets

When savings happen:

  • Large codebases (50+ files) — architecture understanding, cross-file scanning

  • Security audits, dead code detection, API consistency checks

  • Pre-review before targeted edits (scan first → edit specific files)

When to skip and let Claude read directly:

  • Small codebases (<10 files) — direct reading is faster

  • Single-file modifications — Claude's built-in file reading is sufficient

  • When you need every line of code — detailed output approaches raw reading cost

Implementation details

Under the hood:

  1. Claude Code calls an MCP tool (e.g., kimi_analyze)

  2. This server spawns the kimi CLI with the prompt and codebase path

  3. Kimi reads files and analyzes the code (context is the model window; default k3 is up to 1M on eligible plans)

  4. The result is parsed from Kimi's JSON output and returned to Claude Code

  5. Claude acts on the structured results — edits, plans, or further analysis

CLI Invocation Reference

The MCP server runs ~/.local/bin/kimi, reads kimi --help, and calls that binary in non-interactive mode. The flags below match the Kimi Code CLI command reference through 2.4.1 (2026-10-30):

cd <path>
kimi -m kimi-code/k3 -p "<prompt>" --output-format stream-json

Flag

Purpose

-p / --prompt

Run one prompt without the interactive shell

-m <alias>

Select the model explicitly (default: kimi-code/k3)

--output-format stream-json

Emit JSONL assistant/tool messages

Working directory (cwd)

Set the codebase root for the subprocess

-S <id>

Resume a specific session by ID

Legacy CLI options --print, --final-message-only, and --no-thinking are sent only when advertised by that binary's help. Kimi Code 2.x does not support these flags or --work-dir; thinking=false is therefore only applied on supporting legacy CLIs. Do not combine --plan with -p.

If Kimi reports Stored token ... was rejected; re-login required, run kimi login. Local model catalog checks do not verify OAuth validity or remaining quota.

After re-login, custom aliases such as subscription-peer/kimi may disappear. Check kimi provider list and update any explicit model, KIMICODE_MODEL, or KIMI_MODEL override to an available alias. The MCP already defaults to the official kimi-code/k3 alias; it does not require the helper's custom alias.

In-repo tests fixture the 2.1.1 JSONL shape (a minimal K3 prompt returned KIMI_OK after re-login). They were not re-run against the 2.4.1 binary for this doc update. Flag selection still comes from kimi --help, so --print, --final-message-only, and --no-thinking are sent only when that help text lists them.

kimi_status marks the CLI authenticated only when it finds tokens in $KIMI_SHARE_DIR or ~/.kimi/credentials/kimi-code.json (or a legacy ~/.kimi/kimi.json). CLI 2.x stores OAuth under ~/.kimi-code/credentials/ (KIMI_CODE_HOME). A working kimi login can still show "Not authenticated" there. That does not affect kimi_query / kimi_verify.

kimi_list_sessions reads $KIMI_SHARE_DIR/sessions or ~/.kimi/sessions (metadata.json). Current sessions live in ~/.kimi-code/sessions/<workDirKey>/<sessionId>/ and are not listed. kimi_resume still passes -S <id> through, so an id you already have from the CLI can be resumed.

NOTE

There is nokimi analyze subcommand. The MCP tool is named kimi_analyze, but the underlying CLI uses the flags above. Use this syntax to call Kimi directly for debugging or scripting.

Advanced Setup

For development (auto-recompile on changes):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kimi-code": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["tsx", "/absolute/path/to/kimi-code-mcp/src/index.ts"]
    }
  }
}

npm

Published as kimi-mcp-server on npm. The registry copy checked on 2026-11-02 is 0.3.0; this tree is 0.5.0.

npx kimi-mcp-server            # registry build, currently 0.3.0
npm install -g kimi-mcp-server

Project Structure

src/
├── index.ts           # MCP server setup, tool definitions, API-vs-CLI routing
├── kimi-api.ts        # Direct Kimi Code API client (kimi_query / kimi_verify)
├── kimi-runner.ts     # Spawns kimi CLI, parses output, handles timeouts
├── cache-manager.ts   # Session cache (warmup, reuse, invalidation)
└── session-reader.ts  # Legacy session metadata (~/.kimi/sessions, not ~/.kimi-code)

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.

Changelog

See CHANGELOG.md for version history.

License

MIT

Available Tools

8 tools
kimi_analyzeA

Send a prompt to Kimi Code for codebase analysis. Kimi reads the codebase (256K context) and returns a compressed, structured report.

CACHE BEHAVIOR: If session_id is not provided, the MCP server will automatically use cached sessions when available.

  • First call: Creates cache (may take 60-120s for large codebases)

  • Subsequent calls: Reuses cached session (faster, ~10s)

  • Cache auto-expires after 30 minutes or when files change

  • Use kimi_cache_status to view cache statistics

Output is budget-controlled: Kimi reads 200K+ tokens of source but returns a 5-15K token analysis (configurable via detail_level). Use kimi_resume to drill deeper into specific areas. Takes 1-5 minutes for large codebases.

Inputs: prompt (required), work_dir (required), model, thinking, +5 more.

kimi_cache_invalidateA

Manually invalidate session cache entries. Use when you want to force fresh analysis or if you suspect cached sessions are stale.

Inputs: work_dir.

kimi_cache_statusB

View session cache statistics and status. Shows cache hits/misses, active sessions, and performance metrics. Use this to monitor cache effectiveness and troubleshoot issues.

Inputs: detail.

kimi_list_sessionsA

List existing Kimi Code sessions with titles, working directories, and timestamps. Use to find session IDs for kimi_resume.

Inputs: limit, work_dir.

kimi_queryA

Ask Kimi Code a question without codebase context. Default model: k3 (K3). Use for general programming questions, algorithm explanations, or getting a second opinion.

Inputs: prompt (required), model, thinking, include_thinking, +1 more.

kimi_resumeA

Resume an existing Kimi Code session with a new prompt. The session retains all previous context (up to 256K tokens). Use kimi_list_sessions to find session IDs first. Ideal for drilling deeper after an initial kimi_analyze scan.

Inputs: prompt (required), work_dir (required), session_id (required), model, +4 more.

kimi_statusB

Check Kimi CLI/API status, default model (K3 detection), and auth. Set probe_api=true for a live Coding API model echo check.

Inputs: model, probe_api.

kimi_verifyA

Get an INDEPENDENT second opinion from Kimi Code (default k3 / K3, 256K context) acting as an external third-party verifier. Calls the Kimi Code API directly — no CLI install required, just an API key (env KIMICODE_API_KEY or ~/.kimi/config.toml).

USE THIS to cross-check your own work: confirm a fix is correct, hunt for bugs / edge cases / security issues in a diff, sanity-check a claim or plan, or get a dissenting view before you commit. Different model, independent judgment.

CRITICAL — pass full context: Kimi sees ONLY the 'context' string. It has NO access to this session, the repository, prior messages, or any tools. Paste the ACTUAL code/diff/claim AND the surrounding context it needs (the goal, constraints, assumptions, relevant signatures). Vague or partial context produces vague, useless verification.

Detection: every response ends with a [kimi-model …] footer (requested/observed/k3=yes|no).

Inputs: context (required), role, model, question, +2 more.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: listing sessions, analyzing codebase, querying without context, independent verification, cache management, resuming sessions, and status checking. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'kimi_verb' pattern using snake_case (e.g., kimi_analyze, kimi_cache_status). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools covering session management, analysis, verification, and cache control, the count is well-scoped for a code analysis assistant—neither too sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core workflows (analysis, resume, verification, cache, status). A minor gap is the lack of an explicit session deletion tool, but the provided tools enable effective operation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pairs Claude Code with Google's Gemini AI for complementary code analysis, enabling intelligent routing where Claude handles local-context operations while Gemini leverages its 1M token context for distributed system debugging and long-trace analysis.
      10
      109
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to delegate coding tasks to local Ollama models, reducing API token usage by up to 98.75% while leveraging local compute resources. Supports code generation, review, refactoring, and file analysis with Claude providing oversight and quality assurance.
      518 npm
      26
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude Desktop and Claude Code, enabling autonomous exchange of messages, files, and code while keeping their context windows separate.
      35 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP bridge that enables Claude Code to consult the Kimi AI model in a structured challenge-loop for code review, debugging, and architecture evaluation.
      319 npm
      2
      MIT