hostodo_create_dns_record

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since no annotations are provided, the description fully carries the behavioral burden. It transparently states that the tool does not perform the requested action and returns a structured coming_soon response. The warning about secrets adds transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences that convey all necessary information without waste. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a PMF stub, the description covers the essential facts: it creates a stub, records demand, does not act, and warns about secrets. The coming soon nature is clear. It could mention the response structure formally, but the description is adequate for a placeholder.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 4 parameters have descriptions in the schema (coverage 100%), but these descriptions are generic and do not add meaningful detail beyond the parameter names. The tool description itself offers no parameter-specific guidance, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The name and description clearly indicate this tool is for creating a DNS record, and it distinguishes itself by stating it is a 'PMF stub' that does not perform the action. The purpose is clear, though the stub nature adds a caveat.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like hostodo_create_dns_record (a possible future real tool). It only warns not to send secrets and notes it returns a coming_soon response, but lacks explicit usage context or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.