Skip to main content
Glama
hongsw

Claude Agents Power

by hongsw

list-agents

Retrieve all available specialized agents by category or language preference. Simplify agent selection for project role assignments and streamline professional task delegation.

Instructions

List all available agents

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryNoFilter by category
languageNoLanguage preference (en, kr)en
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states it's a list operation, implying read-only behavior, but doesn't cover aspects like pagination, rate limits, authentication requirements, or what 'available' means in context. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It's front-loaded with the core purpose and appropriately sized for a simple list operation, making it highly efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (a filtered list operation) and high schema coverage, the description is minimally adequate. However, with no output schema and no annotations, it should ideally provide more context about return values or behavioral traits to be fully complete for agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, with both parameters ('category' and 'language') well-documented in the input schema. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's in the schema, so it meets the baseline for adequate but not enhanced parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List all available agents' clearly states the action (list) and resource (agents), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'search-agents' or 'get-agent-details', which would require more specificity about scope or filtering capabilities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search-agents' or 'get-agent-details'. There's no mention of prerequisites, context for filtering, or comparison with sibling tools, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hongsw/pair-role-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server