Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hello-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that allows integration with Claude Desktop by creating and managing custom tools that can be executed through the MCP framework.
      96 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server built with mcp-framework that allows users to create and manage custom tools for processing data, integrating with the Claude Desktop via CLI.
      20 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes custom tools to Claude Desktop, enabling direct interaction with your local environment. It provides a framework for building and integrating custom TypeScript tools into the Claude interface.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Easily build MCP tools for Claude desktop app.
      132 npm
      21
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
      2 npm
      -

    TDQS

    D1.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The two tools, 'add' and 'send-email', have no descriptions and appear to serve completely unrelated purposes. An agent cannot determine what 'add' refers to or how it relates to sending email, creating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names follow no consistent pattern: 'add' is a bare verb while 'send-email' uses a verb-noun format with a hyphen. The lack of a shared convention makes the set feel ad hoc.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools and no descriptions, the server appears extremely thin and under-scoped. It is unclear what domain it covers, and two unrelated tools do not form a coherent toolkit.

    Completeness1/5

    The server's purpose is entirely unclear from the tool names alone. 'add' and 'send-email' do not suggest any complete workflow or domain coverage, leaving obvious gaps in any conceivable use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues