List Locations
list_locationsRetrieve all available data center locations to choose the best region for server deployment.
Instructions
List all available data center locations.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_locationsRetrieve all available data center locations to choose the best region for server deployment.
List all available data center locations.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the action, with no disclosure of auth requirements, rate limits, or potential side effects. For a simple read operation, this is minimally acceptable but not thorough.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. For a simple enumeration, it might be sufficient, but it lacks any context about the response format or potential limitations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. Per guidelines, a baseline of 4 applies. The description does not add extra parameter meaning but also does not need to.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (List) and the resource (data center locations). It distinguishes from sibling tools that list other entities like servers or invoices.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. However, the purpose is self-evident given the resource type, and there are no parameters to complicate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hjpotter92/datapacket-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server