Skip to main content
Glama
hjbaard

SolidWorks-MCP

add_fillet

Round edges of a SolidWorks part with a constant or varying radius, selecting edges by axis, face outline, feature, or index. Returns the filleted edge count and mass properties.

Instructions

Round edges of the current part with one constant radius (mm).

edges: "all" (default), "x"/"y"/"z" for edges parallel to that world axis, a face outline like "+z:outline" (the outer edges of the top face, not those of holes in it), every edge of one feature like "feature:Boss" (its top and where it meets the part: a moulded look), or explicit indices like "2,5" from list_edges. radii_at_mm = [[x, y, z, r], ...] makes the radius vary: r at the edge end at each point (list_edges gives the ends), radius_mm at the other ends, straight in between; 'vertex_radii' gives each end's dimension. skip_shorter_mm leaves out edges shorter than that. tangent_propagation=True carries the round on along edges that run on smoothly from the given ones, as SolidWorks does by default: an edge ending where it runs into another tangentially, such as round a fillet, only rounds so. A refusal names the edges the radius does not fit (each tried alone, and with propagation). Returns the number of edges filleted and the mass properties.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoFillet
edgesNoall
radius_mmYes
radii_at_mmNo
skip_shorter_mmNo
tangent_propagationNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.13.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / radii_at_mm
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Radii At Mm"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / skip_shorter_mm
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "title": "Skip Shorter Mm"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / tangent_propagation
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": false,
      +  "title": "Tangent Propagation",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.4.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses failure behavior ("A refusal names the edges the radius does not fit") and return information ("Returns the number of edges filleted and the mass properties"), though it does not discuss prerequisites or feature-creation side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long and dense, but it is front-loaded with the core purpose and every subsequent sentence adds operational detail about edge selection, variable radii, and propagation. It is appropriately sized for a complex CAD operation, though slightly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description supplies substantial behavioral and parameter context, including return values and failure handling. It remains incomplete only because the name parameter is never described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It gives rich meaning for edges, radii_at_mm, skip_shorter_mm, and tangent_propagation, but does not explain the name parameter, leaving one of six parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: "Round edges of the current part with one constant radius (mm)." The operation is clear, but the description does not explicitly differentiate it from sibling tools such as add_chamfer or add_full_round.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the opening sentence and extensive edge-selection guidance, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no when-not-to-use conditions, and no named alternatives among the sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.