Skip to main content
Glama
hjbaard

SolidWorks-MCP

by hjbaard
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SolidWorks-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • solidworks-mcp

      anthonyedgar30000
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, measure, verify, and correct parametric SolidWorks parts and assemblies locally via the COM API, supporting operations like sketching, extruding, modeling, dimensioning, material assignment, export, and assembly mating.
      MIT

    • solidworks-mcp

      Slacker-LLC
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a running SOLIDWORKS session through its COM API, with tools for sketching, feature creation, assemblies, and visual feedback via screenshots.
      20
      Apache 2.0

    • SW_MCP

      d-veloping
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to drive an already-running SOLIDWORKS session over its COM API, so it can build sketches, solid features, reference geometry, assemblies, mates, and engineering drawings, then inspect the result through topology listings, mass properties, measurements, and screenshots returned as images.
      Apache 2.0

    • solidworks-mcp

      lildebil0
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to automate SolidWorks (open/save parts, modify dimensions, export STEP) via COM, and optionally generate geometry using build123d code-CAD with PNG previews.
      MIT

    • apolo-cad

      mariorojasmz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to design parametric 3D CAD models of industrial machinery end-to-end, including modeling, assembly, validation, and manufacturing drawings, through 79 MCP tools.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 86 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools share overlapping purposes (e.g., add_box, add_cylinder, add_disc, add_cone, add_extruded_profile, add_swept_profile all create solids; multiple hole and cut tools). Descriptions are detailed and use-case oriented, which mitigates but does not eliminate misselection risk. With 86 tools, an agent must read carefully to choose the right primitive or cut.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are predominantly snake_case with a consistent verb_noun pattern (add_*, list_*, get_*, set_*, cut_*, check_*). Minor deviations like 'export', 'rebuild', 'screenshot', 'swept_region' break the pattern slightly but overall remain readable and predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    86 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single MCP server; the rubric marks 50+ tools as a 1. While the domain is complex, such a large surface is unwieldy and likely to overwhelm an agent's selection process.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers most part/assembly lifecycle: create, modify, delete features, dimensions, equations, mates, components, export, save/open. Minor gaps like no open_drawing or drawing edit tools, and no sheet metal/weldments, but agents can work around these limitations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources