Skip to main content
Glama
hildersantos

Things MCP

by hildersantos
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Things MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Things MCP Server

      hald
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Things app through Claude Desktop, allowing task creation, project analysis, and priority management using natural language commands.
      22
      555 PyPI
      602
      MIT

    • Things MCP Server

      excelsier
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lets you use Claude Desktop to interact with your task management data in Things app, enabling you to create tasks, analyze projects, manage priorities, and implement productivity workflows through natural language.
      36
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between 'things_get_anytime', 'things_get_someday', 'things_get_today', and 'things_get_upcoming' which could confuse an agent about which to use for time-based queries. The 'things_show' tool is also ambiguous as it navigates rather than retrieves data, potentially overlapping with get tools. However, descriptions help clarify specific contexts like inbox, logbook, or project-specific queries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'things_verb_noun' pattern with snake_case throughout, such as 'things_add_todo', 'things_get_project', and 'things_update_todo'. This predictability makes it easy for an agent to parse and understand the tool set without confusion from mixed conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 20 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a task management domain like Things, covering CRUD operations, queries across different contexts (e.g., inbox, projects, areas), and navigation. It feels comprehensive without being overly bloated, though it could be streamlined by merging some get tools.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the Things domain, including create (add_project, add_todo), read (get_* tools for various contexts), update (update_project, update_todo), and delete (implied via trash). It supports full lifecycle management of todos and projects, with no obvious gaps that would hinder agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources