Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
EvalView

EvalView

by hidai25
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to EvalView

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AI Test Pilot

      Drzymek92
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that generates, runs, and triages tests by introspecting Python modules or web pages, using structured LLM outputs for scenario generation and failure analysis.
      1
      MIT

    • agent-regress

      Gaurav7974
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that provides tools for AI coding agents to execute, evaluate, and diff regression tests for LLM agents.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • Testing MCP

      shalonjovan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A universal AI-powered testing server built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Allows AI agents to inspect, execute, test, monitor, debug, and report on software projects.
      3
      GNU Lesser General Public v2.1 only

    • Glance

      Mendoza86818
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Code a real browser for navigation, interaction, screenshots, and end-to-end testing, including assertions, session recording, visual regression, and console/network monitoring.
      106 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: creating tests, running different types of checks, comparing agents, generating reports, listing, replaying diffs, and validating skills. No overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nine of ten tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_test, run_check). The exception is 'replay', which is a single verb but still unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools cover the evaluation workflow without being excessive. Each tool serves a specific purpose, and the count is well-suited for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are covered: test creation, execution, comparison, reporting, and validation. Minor gap: no explicit tool for deleting or updating tests, but users can manage files directly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources