infomaniak_manage_kchat_bot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that every mutation requires two-phase confirmation, a behavioral trait not present in the annotations. This adds valuable context about the confirmation workflow, though it does not detail what the second phase entails beyond the confirmation_token parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with zero filler. It front-loads the action list and immediately notes the two-phase confirmation, making it easy to scan and understand.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and confirmation behavior but lacks details on action-specific parameter requirements and the expected payload structure. Given the complexity of a multi-action tool, this is a moderate gap, though the output schema and annotations provide some support.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no meaning beyond the schema. It does not explain which parameters are required for each action (e.g., bot_user_id for update/enable/disable/delete, payload for create). With 50% schema description coverage, the description fails to compensate for the remaining gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb list (create, update, enable, disable, delete) with a clear resource (kChat bot), making it unambiguous what the tool does. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_kchat_bots and get_kchat_bot by focusing on mutations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for managing a kChat bot's lifecycle, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives such as getting or listing bots. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, so the guidance is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.