infomaniak_get_public_cloud

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint, which cover the safety and idempotency profile. The description adds no extra behavioral context—beyond the word 'Read', which is consistent—but does not disclose error behaviors, rate limits, or what 'snapshot' implies. No contradiction exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly written sentence with no filler. Every word contributes to conveying the core action and resource, making it an exemplary concise description for a simple getter tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the existence of an output schema, and strong annotations, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks domain context about what a Public Cloud product snapshot is and how to source the public_cloud_id, leaving some ambiguity for an agent unfamiliar with Infomaniak's Public Cloud schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not compensate. The sole parameter, public_cloud_id, is listed with only an exclusiveMinimum constraint, and the description fails to explain how to obtain the ID or what it references. The agent must infer semantics from the parameter name and tool name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Read') and the resource ('one Public Cloud product snapshot'), which aligns with the tool name. However, the term 'product snapshot' is somewhat vague and does not explicitly distinguish it from sibling getters like get_public_cloud_project or get_public_cloud_kubernetes_service, beyond a general sense of 'product'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that a public_cloud_id would typically come from list_public_clouds, or contrast with related getters, leaving the agent without context for tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.