get_sheet_cells_by_notation_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey safety. It states the tool retrieves values, implying read-only behavior, but does not explicitly confirm no side effects or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear first paragraph, but the Args section redundantly lists parameters already in the schema. Well-structured overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with 3 well-documented parameters and an output schema, the description adequately covers purpose, parameters, and return format (including 'mapping'). Missing error or permission details but sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description repeats parameter names and provides an example for 'cell_notations'. This adds minimal value beyond the schema's clear descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get values from specific cells in a sheet.' It specifies the verb (get), resource (cell values), and method (A1 notation). This distinguishes it from the sibling 'get_sheet_cells_by_range_tool', which uses ranges.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains use for retrieving multiple specific cells via A1 notation, with an example. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or compare to alternatives like the range-based tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.