order_certificate_pack

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds key behavioral context about the confirm gate and preview mode beyond annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). No contradiction; mutation is properly signaled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise, front-loaded sentences with zero waste. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Functional but minimal. Lacks details on what happens after ordering (e.g., validation, billing). No output schema, but description does not compensate for that gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description reiterates the confirm requirement but does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Order' and the resource 'advanced certificate pack' for one or more hostnames, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_certificate_packs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly mentions the human-approval gate (confirm:true) and preview behavior, but does not compare to alternatives or specify when not to use it beyond the gate condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.