Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
cloudflare-mcp-pro

cloudflare-mcp-pro

by helbertparanhos
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

list_certificate_packs

Read-only

List SSL/TLS certificate packs for a Cloudflare zone, filtering by status to manage active, pending, or expired certificates.

Instructions

List SSL/TLS certificate packs on a zone.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "zone_id": "<zone_id>"
    },
    "name": "list_certificate_packs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zone_idYesThe Cloudflare zone ID (32-char hex). Get it from list_zones.
statusNoFilter by certificate pack status. Default 'all'.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true. The description adds no behavioral details beyond listing, such as pagination, rate limits, or response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy. Every word is necessary for the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details about the return format (e.g., list of certificate packs with properties). Could be slightly more informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers both parameters with descriptions (zone_id and status). The tool description adds no further meaning; schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and resource ('SSL/TLS certificate packs') with scope ('on a zone'). It is distinct from siblings like 'order_certificate_pack' which handles ordering.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., other list tools or prerequisites like list_zones). The description only states the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools