Skip to main content
Glama

Quake Service Search

quake_service_search

Search real-time Quake services with flexible queries, filtering by IP, ports, fields, and time ranges. Returns specified result sets without deep pagination.

Instructions

Run real-time Quake service search with /api/v3/search/quake_service. Use this for small result sets; use quake_service_scroll for deep pagination.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ruleNoService data collection rule name for IP-list collections.
sizeNoNumber of results to return.
queryYesQuake query, for example service:http or port:443 AND country:"China".
startNoResult start offset.
latestNoWhether to use latest data.
excludeNoComma-separated fields to exclude.
includeNoComma-separated fields to include.
ip_listNoComma-separated IP list.
end_timeNoUTC end time, for example 2020-10-14 00:00:00.
shortcutsNoComma-separated shortcut filter IDs from the web UI.
start_timeNoUTC start time, for example 2020-10-14 00:00:00.
ignore_cacheNoWhether to ignore cached data.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions 'real-time' but lacks details on rate limits, authentication, response format, or side effects. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences front-loading purpose and usage guidance. Every sentence earns its place with zero redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 12 parameters and an output schema, the description does not elaborate on return values or common patterns. It provides essential usage context but lacks depth for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 applies. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema descriptions; it merely restates the endpoint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'Run real-time Quake service search' with specific resource and endpoint. Distinguishes from sibling quake_service_scroll by indicating usage for small result sets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly recommends use for small result sets and directs to quake_service_scroll for deep pagination. Provides clear context but does not explicitly list when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helGayhub233/SurveyHub-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server