Skip to main content
Glama

Hunter Personal Batch Create

hunter_personal_batch_create

Initiate a personal batch search by providing a Hunter query or uploading a CSV file for bulk asset enumeration.

Instructions

Create a Hunter personal batch search task with query or CSV file upload.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoHunter query. Required if file_path is not provided.
fieldsNoComma-separated return fields.
is_webNo1=web, 2=non-web.
end_timeNoEnd date in YYYY-MM-DD.
file_pathNoLocal CSV file path. Required if query is not provided.
start_timeNoStart date in YYYY-MM-DD.
search_typeNoCSV search type. Personal limits: all <=10; ip/domain/company <=100.all
status_codeNoComma-separated status codes, for example "200,401".
assets_limitNoExpected exported asset count.
exact_searchNoFor query mode, convert Hunter field="value" fuzzy comparisons to field=="value" exact comparisons by default.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as async nature, rate limits, or what happens after creation (e.g., returns a task ID). It only says 'create' with no further context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single concise sentence that front-loads the action, though it could benefit from a bit more detail without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It fails to explain return values, async behavior, or related tools like hunter_personal_batch_status.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already described. The description adds 'with query or CSV file upload', hinting at two modes, but does not add specific parameter semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a batch search task, distinguishing it from the personal search tool (hunter_personal_search) which likely does single searches, but it does not explicitly contrast with siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use batch vs search, no prerequisites, no mention of when to use query vs file upload, and no alternatives listed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helGayhub233/SurveyHub-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server