Skip to main content
Glama
hasarahman

DepHealth MCP

by hasarahman
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to DepHealth MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Security Intel MCP

      datakoot
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Vulnerability intelligence for AI agents that enables CVE lookup, package vulnerability checks, and dependency auditing without API keys.
      MIT

    • closeread-verify

      FreeGuy-AI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides verified dependency-audit verdicts for AI agents, checking installed versions against OSV advisories and splitting direct vs transitive dependencies.
      3
      MIT

    • DepShield MCP

      devanshkaria88
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Acts as a security checkpoint for AI coding agents by intercepting package installations to verify existence, check against CVE databases, and block vulnerable or hallucinated dependencies before they reach your codebase. Provides seven security tools including pre-install gates, full project audits, safe version recommendations, and deep transitive dependency scanning for npm and PyPI packages.
      7
      93 npm
      4
      MIT

    • pkgtruth

      hxckya
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and CI to vet npm dependencies before they reach the lockfile, flagging hallucinated, slopsquatted, or otherwise risky packages with evidence-backed verdicts.
      3
      48 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: audit_project scans entire project manifests for vulnerabilities, while check_package assesses a single package before adding/upgrading. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (audit_project, check_package), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but well-scoped for dependency health auditing. While additional tools could be added, the current set covers the core use cases.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the primary needs: scanning a project and checking a single package. Missing operations like updating dependencies or listing all vulnerabilities are minor gaps that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources