A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that provides visual question answering, image description, object detection, OCR, and image manipulation tools using OpenAI-compatible vision models.
12
75 npm
GPL 2.0
Luma Vision MCP
by harryopo
Related Servers
Alternatives to Luma Vision MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that provides vision capabilities to text-only models like Claude Code and Codex by forwarding images to an OpenAI-compatible multimodal model, offering tools for image analysis and OCR.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA universal MCP server that adds image recognition and OCR capabilities to text-only LLMs like DeepSeek, supporting any OpenAI-compatible multimodal provider.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that adds vision capabilities to text-only AI models by sending images (local files, URLs, clipboard, screenshots) to a vision model and returning text descriptions.1208 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables text-only models to understand images through a conversational MCP server, supporting multi-turn follow-ups, URL inputs, and OpenAI-compatible vision APIs.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that gives text-only AI agents the ability to understand images via vision tools, including multi-image analysis, OCR, comparison, and structured extraction. It uses providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and OpenRouter to return plain text descriptions.106 npmMIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: general understanding, high-precision OCR, and image comparison. The optional OCR task type in image_understand could cause minor overlap, but the descriptions clearly position image_ocr as the specialized tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tool names share the 'image_' prefix and use snake_case, which is consistent. However, 'image_ocr' uses an acronym while the others use verbs, creating a minor stylistic inconsistency.
Tool Count5/5
With only 3 tools, the server is well-scoped and each tool covers a fundamental vision task. This is appropriate for a focused utility without unnecessary bloat.
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers the core image understanding workflows: general QA, text extraction, and diff comparison. Minor gaps like explicit image metadata extraction or more granular analysis options exist, but the primary use cases are well supported.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues