disconnect
Close the active CAN interface connection to terminate communication with the bus.
Instructions
Close the current CAN interface connection.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Close the active CAN interface connection to terminate communication with the bus.
Close the current CAN interface connection.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must bear the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without revealing side effects (e.g., discarding queued data), error conditions, or whether it blocks.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that immediately states the action with no extraneous words. Highly concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple, the description omits prerequisites (must be connected), potential errors (e.g., already disconnected), and any post-conditions. Minimum viable but has gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist (100% schema coverage), so the baseline is 4. The description adds no extra parameter information, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Close the current CAN interface connection,' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool 'connect' implicitly, as it is the inverse operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, such as requiring a prior connection or not disconnecting during active communication. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/harrisonfaulkner/canbus-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server