delete_range

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include destructiveHint=true, so the description does not need to reinforce destructiveness. It adds value by specifying that remaining cells shift after deletion, which is beyond the annotation. However, it omits details like formula/format behavior or undo limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no redundant words. It efficiently conveys the core operation and its immediate effect.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not mention the return value or confirm success. It also lacks parameter details and does not cover edge cases or prerequisites, making it incomplete for a 5-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 5 parameters with 0% description coverage, yet the tool description adds no explanation for any parameter. It only generically mentions 'range of cells', leaving filepath, sheet_name, start_cell, end_cell, and shift_direction unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete a range of cells') and the resource ('range of cells'), and mentions the behavioral consequence ('shift remaining cells'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like delete_sheet_columns or delete_sheet_rows, which target entire columns/rows.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternative tools such as delete_sheet_columns or delete_sheet_rows. The description does not mention conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.