Skip to main content
Glama
hara-lang

hara-mcp

Official
by hara-lang
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to hara-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mindustry-mcp

      hubdustrylab
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to launch and manage an owned Mindustry runtime, create logic fixtures, configure processors with mlog programs, observe live memory values, and verify program replacements with digest preconditions.
      1
      -

    • CodexPro Runtime

      Menglook
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local, evidence-driven MCP runtime and control plane for open-source maintainers that provides workspace-bounded tools including controlled file operations, command execution, validation primitives, durable execution records, and human review workflows via stdio and Streamable HTTP transports.
      33
      MIT

    • laviya-mcp-server

      kartegagithub
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-oriented MCP runtime providing orchestration tools for IDE and agent integrations, including task management, diagnostics, and token usage reporting.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct purpose: eval executes inline source, call invokes a loaded var, check runs diagnostics, and runtime_get provides environment info. There is no meaningful overlap among the four tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a clean verb pattern (hara_eval, hara_call, hara_check), but hara_runtime_get uses a noun-verb ordering that slightly deviates. The prefix is consistent, and the naming remains intuitive overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a tight, focused set for a niche language runtime server. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core execution and checking workflow is well covered. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit var-loading or listing mechanism, but since call assumes pre-loaded vars, this may be handled externally.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources