Skip to main content
Glama
handsomer89

OpenFic MCP

by handsomer89
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenFic MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • calibreweb-mcp

      ni-c
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that connects to Calibre-Web ebook libraries via OPDS feeds, enabling AI assistants to search and browse books, shelves, covers, and library statistics.
      6
      43 npm
      MIT

    • tavern-tanuki

      fannnnnnn5822
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing and playing a running SillyTavern instance, enabling AI coding assistants to read/write character cards, worldbooks, and chats, and to interact as a player via the full generation pipeline.
      19
      -

    • scrivener-mcp

      sschmitt-cg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that exposes Scrivener projects to AI clients, enabling project creation, binder navigation, document read/write, and metadata updates without opening Scrivener.
      104 npm
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: list/get/search are consistently separated, and worldbook tools are differentiated by purpose (by ID vs project-configured). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, search_, read_, openfic_health being the only exception, but that is a distinct health check). The naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    22 tools is slightly above the typical range, but each tool earns its place given the breadth of entity types (projects, volumes, chapters, summaries, characters, notes, worldbooks). The count is reasonable for the scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only surface covers all major entities with list/get/search variants, leaving no obvious dead ends for reading. Write operations (create/update/delete) are absent, but the server appears intentionally read-only for context provision, so only minor gaps like search_projects exist.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources